Re: [irtf-discuss] NSRG Archives

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Fri, 16 July 2021 09:48 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5263A303A for <irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 02:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.891
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.891 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qnvZ62VTz3xW for <irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 02:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [185.32.222.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 142573A3039 for <irtf-discuss@irtf.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 02:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Lear-Air.home (pool-173-54-226-148.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net [173.54.226.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-18) with ESMTPSA id 16G9lubV255113 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:47:57 +0200
Authentication-Results: upstairs.ofcourseimright.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lear.ch
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1626428878; bh=YtfndS5AZQgb0WVG1UL0ILA9D2uyT4tLSXLUGaRF7lU=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=UEX3GVf0KepumPfOMtfGrtxoclkxUmUTTjuLUZ4g7SXGu6Lwy9OZuIPgD9V6IDMgo PHmC6JYiy3NCwm/bQypxsSd9yRS2Q1q1Tr7Hl64ADDdMhUJs31m0V8uGUzV4l9ZvOu pFh8dLa1fDcdycrXAad788iKcMN8tSvVcfnmOPhc=
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Babakian <Andrew.Babakian@student.uts.edu.au>, "irtf-discuss@irtf.org" <irtf-discuss@irtf.org>, steve@shinkuro.com, smb@cs.columbia.edu
References: <SY4PR01MB6608F95E6F6A15E1C158456487129@SY4PR01MB6608.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com> <8EE29B7E-D570-4A57-BC5D-B5970897ACD9@eggert.org> <e6806490-c420-20f9-8920-3eff8aaaa3cd@gmail.com> <AEF67270-8C40-4D7A-984F-192BCDF527A0@eggert.org>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
Message-ID: <9f993129-54fc-fcb9-393f-0996e17b90a8@lear.ch>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 05:47:55 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AEF67270-8C40-4D7A-984F-192BCDF527A0@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xSFudMDkPPbyekl0VjHmJVzbrZw6QsGji"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/irtf-discuss/ntCYon9haDNNv_G1QNfBTFpFmFY>
Subject: Re: [irtf-discuss] NSRG Archives
X-BeenThere: irtf-discuss@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF general and new-work discussion list <irtf-discuss.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/irtf-discuss>, <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/irtf-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:irtf-discuss@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/irtf-discuss>, <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 09:48:14 -0000

My recollection is approximately 25.

On 16.07.21 10:08, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> apologies that I missed this having been a closed RG.
>
> On 2021-7-16, at 0:01, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have 122 messages that were sent to nsrg@stevecrocker.com in 1999-2004. Since it was an invitational group, I'm not sure what the ethics are of releasing them.
> How many member did the NSRG have? I wonder if it would be feasible to contact them to ask about making the archives public?
>
> (More generally, I think it would be useful if the records of such historic closed groups could be made available for posterity in some form.)
>
> Thanks,
> Lars
>