IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [irtf-discuss] Why do we need to go with 128 bits address space ?

"Mark Allman" <mallman@icir.org> Thu, 15 August 2019 15:29 UTC

Return-Path: <mallman@icir.org>
X-Original-To: irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47440120808 for <irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ssd0trO46-HI for <irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rock.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (rock.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU [192.150.186.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DC51120127 for <irtf-discuss@irtf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE6E2C4017; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU
Received: from rock.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (maihub.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id bjDLwrSE00a9; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (scone [192.150.186.121]) by rock.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47442C4009; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.244] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lawyers.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876A4185925A; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:29:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
To: Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Roland Bless <roland.bless@kit.edu>, irtf-discuss@irtf.org, 6man@ietf.org, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, shyam bandyopadhyay <shyamb66@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:29:06 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.5r5635)
Message-ID: <6E69E98D-12F5-4F7C-9E6B-3E504AD6EEA1@icsi.berkeley.edu>
In-Reply-To: <CANMZLAat4X+Eh+fgTrbikO6dusvcvvUr5foj=3OEnbRhQtOHSw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPTMOt+cGhBqHmT3yZVChv-PCMqxT-WPDcDdM3RuTc1TMfFeVg@mail.gmail.com> <cd254463-43ba-2afd-5c3c-f462a74e5c30@kit.edu> <CANMZLAat4X+Eh+fgTrbikO6dusvcvvUr5foj=3OEnbRhQtOHSw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/irtf-discuss/u9T_SWJzN_q2XKEvMicsWQY3dyU>
Subject: Re: [irtf-discuss] Why do we need to go with 128 bits address space ?
X-BeenThere: irtf-discuss@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF general and new-work discussion list <irtf-discuss.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/irtf-discuss>, <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/irtf-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:irtf-discuss@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/irtf-discuss>, <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 15:29:16 -0000

> g) it's 25 years too late for this discussion even if we were wrong

+1

Wow ... just wow ...

allman



--
https://www.icir.org/mallman/
@mallman_icsi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email