Re: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-07

"Naiming Shen (naiming)" <naiming@cisco.com> Mon, 27 November 2017 21:38 UTC

Return-Path: <naiming@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7967129413; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 13:38:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ae_2wHWDh3AV; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 13:38:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B20D129410; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 13:38:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10270; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1511818723; x=1513028323; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=GFP+DpSkraBxmOzTJ7qcrYEUM0OC7gF3LH2Vfn5uxT0=; b=HVZPaBwA73RTDktBiwrOLmLBv4VLkleSD7hXjYvQwcNRyrPkAhQCL1cx HiIznS8Gna8YX9DYM+Lg8g8hYoRuqf4wrSBZIOJbE5P8i9hYYFRRVO7xi n5Emne396I+k6czBBzfl1PM1YpNw5qAxztnVXwe2GDiEpZYrhFZXYloZe 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0C2AADvhBxa/4ENJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYJKcmZuFBMHg3iKII8VkyGFSYIRChgBCoUYAhqEWj8YAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBayiFIAIEAQEbBksLEAIBCD8DAgICJQsUEQIEDgWJPmQQpnCCJ4p6AQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWDOoIHg2eDAoVSgl8xgjIFkXaHMIkgAodwjRq?= =?us-ascii?q?CFoYMiyyMdokXAhEZAYE5AR85JoEqbxU5KgGBfoRVd4kXgRQBAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.44,465,1505779200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="37061359"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 27 Nov 2017 21:38:42 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-015.cisco.com (xch-aln-015.cisco.com [173.36.7.25]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vARLcgBh031956 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 Nov 2017 21:38:42 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) by XCH-ALN-015.cisco.com (173.36.7.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 15:38:41 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-004.cisco.com ([173.37.102.14]) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com ([173.37.102.14]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 15:38:41 -0600
From: "Naiming Shen (naiming)" <naiming@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
CC: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "isis-wg@ietf.org" <isis-wg@ietf.org>, "isis-ads@ietf.org" <isis-ads@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-07
Thread-Index: AQHTXmMvIlsDCkaUj0W5jcon0L55haMkmSOAgASe3AA=
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 21:38:41 +0000
Message-ID: <487DD301-14A0-4DE6-9AD2-367A4B9B0402@cisco.com>
References: <87375fp3hv.fsf@chopps.org> <D63E0C77.DB3C2%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D63E0C77.DB3C2%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.32.172.120]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_487DD30114A04DE69AD2367A4B9B0402ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/2QKrGulza1KM0ZKl-AwWuWcag-Y>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-07
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 21:38:46 -0000

Hi Acee,

thanks for the comments. replies inline with <NS>…</NS>

On Nov 24, 2017, at 3:05 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>> wrote:

Hi,

I support publication of the subject document. I do have comments.

  1. Why do you call the reverse-metricn field, “Metric Offset”? This
sounds like a remnant of some bad 20th century CLI….

<NS>
the draft used to have the field as just ‘Metric’, since version 06, we responded
to the comments:


Section 2

From the description what is being advertised in the new TLV is not a metric but a metric offset i.e. you want the receiving IS to add the advertised value to its existing configured metric. Identifying the metric field as "metric offset" would make this point more clearly.


which is a good point I think. do you think there is an alternative name we
can use in replacing the ‘offset’ here?
</NS>


  2. Please split the single sentence description immediately following
figure 1 into multiple sentences. Maybe just refer to “Elements of
Procedure” sections rather than one incomprehensible sentence.
  3. Pervasive editorial comment, the plural of acronyms is does NOT have
an apostrophe. For example, it is TLVs, not TLV’s.

<NS>
will change those.

thanks.
- Naiming
</NS>


Thanks,
Acee


On 11/15/17, 5:43 PM, "Isis-wg on behalf of Christian Hopps"
<isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of chopps@chopps.org<mailto:chopps@chopps.org>> wrote:


The authors have asked for and we are starting a WG Last Call on

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric/

which will last an extended 3 weeks to allow for IETF100.

Thanks,
Chris.

_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
Isis-wg@ietf.org<mailto:Isis-wg@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg

_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
Isis-wg@ietf.org<mailto:Isis-wg@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg