Re: [Isis-wg] comments on draft-litkowski-isis-yang-isis-cfg-01

[Hannes Gredler <[e-mail]>]

hi eric, stephane,

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 06:04:28PM +0000, Wunan (Eric) wrote:
[ ... ]
|    6. Missing traffic engineering ?
| 
| 
| 
|    [SLI] Only wide metrics are there , but not traffic-eng. I was wondering
|    if TE should be part of a separate datamodel (using augmentation) and so
|    can be used for both OSPF and ISIS protocols ¡­ point to discuss ¡­
| 
|    [Eric] Agree to be a separate model. That's will be better.

hmm can we first collect some TE related atrributes that apply both to
OSPF and IS_IS before making that call ?


[ ... ]
|    8. Missing redistribution related cfg ?
| 
| 
| 
|    [SLI] Route-filters are part of the core data model. But maybe we need to
|    augment stuffs ¡­ I did not look at it yet.
 
that one might get hairy pretty soon ... as some vendors define
their leak policy as prefix, lists and some others call into
execution of a policy language.

 
|    9. Multi-topology should allow to configure more besides ipv4-uni,
|    ipv6-uni, ipv4-multi, ipv6-multi
| 
|    These are commonly used configuration which should not be omitted.
| 
| 
| 
|    [SLI] Please provide more details on what you want.
| 
|    [Eric] Multi-topology for non-standard ones. This model should allow this.

do you have a use-case for this ? - any document that you can refer to ?


/hannes