[Isis-wg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5302 (3994)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 21 May 2014 05:13 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC461A0277 for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 May 2014 22:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.853
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.853 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rBraez4ntMgX for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 May 2014 22:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9FB1A0493 for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 May 2014 22:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id C0C05180204; Tue, 20 May 2014 22:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
To: tony.li@tony.li, hhw.smit@xs4all.nl, prz@net4u.ch, akatlas@gmail.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, hannes@juniper.net, chopps@rawdofmt.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20140521051256.C0C05180204@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 22:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/4mOwPxq9BL9nnGOvBLV_q05EdHE
Cc: kalitaamit@yahoo.com, isis-wg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Isis-wg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5302 (3994)
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 05:13:09 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5302,
"Domain-Wide Prefix Distribution with Two-Level IS-IS".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5302&eid=3994

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Amit Kalita <kalitaamit@yahoo.com>

Section: 3.1

Original Text
-------------
L2->L1 inter-area external routes with external metric:  These are
      advertised in L1 LSPs, in TLV 130.  The up/down bit is set to one,
      metric-type is external metric.  These IP prefixes are learned via
      L2 routing, and were derived during the L1 SPF computation from
      prefixes advertised in L2 LSPs in TLV 130 with external metrics.


Corrected Text
--------------
L2->L1 inter-area external routes with external metric:  These are
      advertised in L1 LSPs, in TLV 130.  The up/down bit is set to one,
      metric-type is external metric.  These IP prefixes are learned via
      L2 routing, and were derived during the L2 SPF computation from
      prefixes advertised in L2 LSPs in TLV 130 with external metrics.


Notes
-----
The following part has been corrected:

"These IP prefixes are learned via
      L2 routing, and were derived during the L1 (should be L2) SPF computation from
      prefixes advertised in L2 LSPs in TLV 130 with external metrics."

The IP prefixes which are learned via L2 routing were derived during L2 SPF computation instead of L1 SPF computation from prefixes advertised in L2 LSPs. As these prefixes were originally advertised in L2 area hence the SPF for these prefixes should  run on the L2 LSPs and eventually the prefixes derived through L2 LSP should be leaked into L1 area.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5302 (draft-ietf-isis-rfc2966bis-03)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Domain-Wide Prefix Distribution with Two-Level IS-IS
Publication Date    : October 2008
Author(s)           : T. Li, H. Smit, T. Przygienda
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : IS-IS for IP Internets
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG