Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption poll for draft-hegde-isis-advertising-te-protocols

Julien -

I think the issue you raise first needs to be discussed in CCAMP (or perhaps MPLS) WG. If there is agreement that this is a problem which needs to be addressed then a draft can be written. Perhaps this is RFC 5073bis - perhaps something else.

As far as link level signaling, in IS-IS there is already provision for that using link attributes sub-TLV defined in RFC 5029: https://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints/isis-tlv-codepoints.xhtml#isis-tlv-codepoints-19of22
If signaling is required to address the issue you raise that would be the most appropriate place to do it.

I don't think your issue is in scope for either draft-hegde-isis-advertising-te-protocols or draft-ietf-isis-te-app.

   Les

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Isis-wg [mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 7:15 AM
> To: isis-wg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption poll for draft-hegde-isis-advertising-te-
> protocols
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I support the adoption of draft-hegde-isis-advertising-te-protocols as a
> foundation for a WG item. A per-link "Capability sub-TLV" (the term
> "protocol" might be too specific here) really adds a missing piece after RFC
> 5073.
> 
> Once WG document, we may discuss an additional use case suggested by
> that RFC: on top of RSVP-TE support, distinguish between 3209-only and
> 3473-capable. Indeed, there are parameters like SRLGs that were defined as
> part of GMPLS extensions: an implementation (wildly) guessing RFC
> 3473 support from that would not be fully wrong. Similarly, an
> implementation may perfectly support 3473 even if it has not explicitly
> advertise a PSC switching capability on a given link. Let us make these
> explicit!
> 
> My 2 cents,
> 
> Julien
> 
> 
> Oct. 07, 2017 - Christian Hopps:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > The authors have requested the IS-IS WG adopt
> >
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hegde-isis-advertising-te-proto
> > cols/
> >
> > as a working group document. Please indicate your support or
> > no-support for taking on this work.
> >
> > Authors: Please indicate your knowledge of any IPR related to this
> > work to the list as well.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chris & Hannes.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Isis-wg mailing list
> > Isis-wg@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg