IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption poll for draft-hegde-isis-advertising-te-protocols

prz <prz@zeta2.ch> Thu, 19 October 2017 13:45 UTC

Return-Path: <prz@zeta2.ch>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3FAB128D0D; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 06:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.593
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.593 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UQuGehzaaOcd; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 06:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zeta2.ch (unknown [80.254.172.86]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26DB912421A; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 06:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.zeta2.ch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: prz) by zeta2.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CDED230DE4; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 15:45:16 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 06:45:16 -0700
From: prz <prz@zeta2.ch>
To: stephane.litkowski@orange.com
Cc: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, isis-wg@ietf.org, isis-chairs@ietf.org, isis-ads@ietf.org, draft-hegde-isis-advertising-te-protocols@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <22629_1508224204_59E5ACCC_22629_174_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF921EA88229@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <87infr1xw0.fsf@chopps.org> <22629_1508224204_59E5ACCC_22629_174_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF921EA88229@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Message-ID: <99bf878e8a6047b03590cde72f9e6faa@zeta2.ch>
X-Sender: prz@zeta2.ch
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.4.2
X-MailScanner-ID: CDED230DE4.A36D8
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamScore: s
X-MailScanner-From: prz@zeta2.ch
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/5C9vVpISS5lot_7aPFFrlDGgXmI>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption poll for draft-hegde-isis-advertising-te-protocols
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 13:45:23 -0000

 +1 support

 thanks

 --- tony

 On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 07:10:03 +0000, <stephane.litkowski@orange.com> 
 wrote:
> Hi Chairs,
>
> I support the idea of having an explicit "protocol" enablement that
> includes RSVP. IMO this must be decoupled from the attributes
> advertisement. So draft-hegde-isis-advertising-te-protocols comes 
> with
> a good proposal here.
> I do not support to include SRTE in the same framework as SRTE
> activation is not a per link property.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email