IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Isis-wg] Mail regarding draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles

Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net> Tue, 10 May 2016 13:30 UTC

Return-Path: <shraddha@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BAF12D09C; Tue, 10 May 2016 06:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HCKP5XO4wGQJ; Tue, 10 May 2016 06:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0124.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7391912B022; Tue, 10 May 2016 06:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=Bx05QLCOe7LnidgXIUudfI4r2LdGdQ/xtAkbui1FP0M=; b=UYx7f0vL9XIYExDCPwh/7yucBT8B2kWusFDJoB1yGdo2eb52LsRDRuYLvzOohnb6R3mrD9T0jNpqq0lTHiVwbrAG4o24ogcRUIyYCEIMkmGyw+s/fFaZycsz7a8ghNxfiwKYUjMEKAnuQJvbH9QJJAL04y9j992wnqhafxk3kO8=
Received: from BN3PR05MB2706.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.167.2.135) by BN3PR05MB2706.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.167.2.135) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.492.11; Tue, 10 May 2016 13:30:32 +0000
Received: from BN3PR05MB2706.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.167.2.135]) by BN3PR05MB2706.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.167.2.135]) with mapi id 15.01.0492.016; Tue, 10 May 2016 13:30:32 +0000
From: Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>
To: "draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Mail regarding draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles
Thread-Index: AdGqvcPaRvaJKpRnRESC+nv4N2fWPA==
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 13:30:32 +0000
Message-ID: <BN3PR05MB27067757FCE70FEF9561A988D5710@BN3PR05MB2706.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [116.197.184.13]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 34c8235b-868f-43fd-b5c1-08d378d742e1
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR05MB2706; 5:CxrnYuBqt80mig3DouVCXmv3kzlPMLTTr1U5epQAtxKyFLdLbkrtpqWin3OziY/HTfkmjWigyRErkzcjx2Z2hV/rnM2fZpjawa1Wxjaar8ffNUn6sqGcG9tzRH99CwpKHDKmQTidQs7na8pXYE4HhA==; 24:+pDBfv8spo3laEC5T35g8oujai39NnfF2EqwvHHZijqyxFw0F+9U92VS6UeuCT59OoduvzXdt4MNlBkfpbvQiH1Jzwlh2eVikgjnZKSq0vo=; 7:3IvSEf7ow9fnnH6jclNkDqywvl6nfy2hzQO1WmPsJkD7/nY/qWEMnElkbz/bPWoSwKrC5TIKTA2Jn0jyvgXGaaBKie9Au6vJwKQAkx5gS7m6CcrPqNPkAdOLVac38H8Fb+9SR5TdxNsuAq9tAL5FmgSte07m9XQpAwcWK2dqCUq2GkLw40yPqfwuhEJpgxod
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN3PR05MB2706;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR05MB27067CC4F433AC77FF6DB66FD5710@BN3PR05MB2706.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026); SRVR:BN3PR05MB2706; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR05MB2706;
x-forefront-prvs: 0938781D02
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(76576001)(19580395003)(2501003)(2900100001)(66066001)(33656002)(110136002)(92566002)(122556002)(189998001)(19625215002)(229853001)(77096005)(16236675004)(11100500001)(2351001)(19300405004)(99286002)(8936002)(15975445007)(5004730100002)(86362001)(450100001)(10400500002)(5003600100002)(54356999)(87936001)(50986999)(74316001)(5002640100001)(9686002)(81166005)(3660700001)(2906002)(1220700001)(5008740100001)(5630700001)(5640700001)(4326007)(102836003)(586003)(3280700002)(790700001)(3846002)(6116002)(230783001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR05MB2706; H:BN3PR05MB2706.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BN3PR05MB27067757FCE70FEF9561A988D5710BN3PR05MB2706namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 10 May 2016 13:30:32.3668 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR05MB2706
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/AGCEsOpbWeoUTirM_2hYMOsTr4I>
Cc: "isis-wg@ietf.org list" <isis-wg@ietf.org>
Subject: [Isis-wg] Mail regarding draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 13:30:42 -0000

Authors,

I have a few generic comments on the draft.


-          The draft needs an "elements of procedure" section that talks about when the new TLV gets originated/updated/purged


-          Section 2.2 talks about shared attributes sub-tlv. It's not clear why the  sub-tlvs  defined for tlv 22/222 needs to be added/duplicated

In TLV 25. For ex: link bandwidth sub TLV will be part of tlv 22 so what is the specific need to add it in TLV25 as well?

What would be the behavior if the contents of sub-tlvs from 22 and 25 do not match?



If there are no specific use cases, it's better to omit this section (In the interest of reducing implementation complexity)

and add it later in a new draft whenever such a use case arises.





Rgds

Shraddha

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email