[Isis-wg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10: (with COMMENT)

["Ben Campbell" <[e-mail]>]

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Just a couple of nits:

- 4.1, last paragraph: "Each tag SHOULD be treated as an independent
identifier that MAY be
   used in policy to perform a policy action."

I think the MAY may be spurious. It seems to be a statement of fact about
the tag, rather than an implementation choice. (But this is a borderline
case of spuriousness).

- 8: In addition to Alvaro and Alissa's comments, remember that RFCs live
forever. Statements that other work needs to happen will (hopefully)
become dated. Some qualifier like "At the time of this writing..." can
help.