Re: [Isis-wg] early proposed charter for the Link-State Routing WG

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Thu, 25 January 2018 12:33 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2192E12025C; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 04:33:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.018
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KplIx0ORzuUg; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 04:33:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84B64124319; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 04:33:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id r78so14653402wme.0; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 04:33:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=bUPAQLakXtK9myBKkm301evwTa1MF57o7DODuleigw0=; b=EiijPkuKquA2A1MRNCYxCvB5+bT6WOReCTmsoVUN/56JbkyXnvaWc8wi8otmSGuf7o izXbzdObg4MvT3I6wMEPfUIgL9uD8KhIYp8abOxLMDGmHzvc8iVZJLOfpSlPRPTLnCc8 W8XVdENOxXrkDbvigjHwKTut+ZCVFcb4r5xHNvqdrAciPcbi7nEkpmXV9XoXezE0FUdM 9gV9RhrowJbSbzduUu9BvwSMdNrMRwaguCbFFv9kCbC/FSwjWTBb6v6DXY/16zUZJZ7V 8S6IUiLXUrxc2ydl49IigGqGXGix32IGaROaHx/vr5wwNDXFqkE2sZL7JP1RoyznMnNX X4JQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=bUPAQLakXtK9myBKkm301evwTa1MF57o7DODuleigw0=; b=Sp00O9tZ5g1XnxI1vkL2c12rK/yrUHIMrN4JDZL9hVKGicyvyP2sqGkNZK9OqJlScM VOkoL/cAykGzlgUiqazFg01ySU3Ra8aR6FdMIOvJ7oXG4KYAYxUyAPDDf13Rpdt++kcO 6n28n1YZe/NsZgrm4zcSnd+GgcQhG/WdjRDcy8DLFqSV0xcmHU98Ujfe6+zwmd07A0L/ eu2LhjvnXce0+OV0bySVTnyEWeqDXdUoNVyQfSaQS9sPM7O0+sSZG/LefnIN1OmKR0ih 3HO0JlTeDuZsNX558QjJxFNV/FwUy10GFqPREVlWHxGpGRdvM1r2NN1X8GqzBVSMr2bx P89w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytdk47hXodmhxG9xsOBWCRhdwPYbVyWb7heDSxE6gECCms4mBcbC RfXQlhBWH1lAtiidBBaV5MMstkBn
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225Gvj06PE9xRQd1OoHsgszrHNcD76WctQGwkf1MmtAymXPqtlfdKOfq/D7YMzKF+el0Or5A/w==
X-Received: by 10.28.185.79 with SMTP id j76mr7258859wmf.35.1516883553796; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 04:32:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.126] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w11sm5764437wrg.42.2018.01.25.04.32.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Jan 2018 04:32:33 -0800 (PST)
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, isis-wg@ietf.org, OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Cc: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
References: <CAG4d1rf1njJF0vpt8tQ3vQUTBC4T+_ZJw=2DGHViSqW6pfvMjg@mail.gmail.com> <B88BAC8E-4642-4E39-82E0-D4FBA90DD76A@gmail.com>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0cadbfa7-a537-889e-b1fc-58d0ccb4ae10@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 12:32:33 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B88BAC8E-4642-4E39-82E0-D4FBA90DD76A@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------E6BBB64ED0BA7F54B578791D"
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/DGJUiGhRzi06IUhsUEYqn22G-fo>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] early proposed charter for the Link-State Routing WG
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 12:33:39 -0000

+1

S


On 24/01/2018 23:27, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
>
> Hi Alia,
>
> +1 on keeping FRR work in RTGWG ;-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeff
>
> *From: *rtgwg <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Alia Atlas 
> <akatlas@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 09:22
> *To: *<isis-wg@ietf.org>rg>, OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
> *Cc: *RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *early proposed charter for the Link-State Routing WG
>
> I am working on the initial charter for the LSR WG, which will combine 
> the
>
> OSPF and ISIS WGs.  At this time, I do not see moving the fast-reroute 
> work
>
> from RTGWG, but I am willing to hear opinions.
>
> In general, feedback on what areas should be the initial focus or 
> specific
>
> concerns on scoping would be useful. My basic plan is for a broad 
> charter focused
>
> on maintenance, usage scenarios, and extensions - much as OSPF and 
> ISIS are
>
> chartered today.
>
> I would like to have this on the February 8 IESG telechat, so rapid 
> feedback and reviews
>
> of the proposed charter when it is sent out would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alia
>
> _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list 
> rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg