IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Isis-wg] 答复: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-07

Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com> Thu, 21 December 2017 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C6B124319; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:32:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cqediAEJZwd1; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:32:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C14F81242F5; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:32:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 607402C5B4869; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:32:46 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.74) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:32:48 +0000
Received: from NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.57]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 08:32:45 +0800
From: Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
To: "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com>, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "isis-wg@ietf.org" <isis-wg@ietf.org>
CC: "isis-ads@ietf.org" <isis-ads@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-07
Thread-Index: AQHTeW06jM1ACd6ZqkWd9nK7C4/M2KNLdv2AgAF7ihA=
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:32:44 +0000
Message-ID: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE304A6963@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <87ind1pzn8.fsf@chopps.org> <3406a4622ee74862bd7be4477cc0bd5a@XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <3406a4622ee74862bd7be4477cc0bd5a@XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.184.181]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/DpBRy0HVcj5uVzhfdOdt5Cw4Uac>
Subject: [Isis-wg] 答复: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-07
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:32:53 -0000

As for the maximum label stack depth reading capability, it has been defined in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc and https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc. Once the WGLC for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label is finished, we will request the WGLC for the above two drafts.

Best regards,
Xiaohu

> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Isis-wg [mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
> 发送时间: 2017年12月20日 17:51
> 收件人: Christian Hopps; isis-wg@ietf.org
> 抄送: isis-ads@ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd@ietf.org
> 主题: Re: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-07
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I support this document and would like to ask the authors and WG to consider if
> we can expand the scope of this draft to not just "imposition" of the SID stack
> but also other similar limits related to other actions (e.g. reading, processing,
> etc.). With Segment Routing, we are coming across various actions that nodes
> need to do with the SID stack for different purposes and IMHO it would be
> useful to extend the MSD ability to cover those as they arise.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ketan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Isis-wg [mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
> Sent: 20 December 2017 14:03
> To: isis-wg@ietf.org
> Cc: isis-ads@ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd@ietf.org
> Subject: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-07
> 
> 
> The authors have asked for and we are starting a WG Last Call on
> 
>  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd/
> 
> which will last an extended 4 weeks to allow for year-end PTO patterns.
> 
> An IPR statement exists:
> 
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-isis-segment-
> routing-msd
> 
> Authors please reply to the list indicating whether you are aware of any
> *new* IPR.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email