[Isis-wg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-remaining-lifetime-03: (with COMMENT)
"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 16 August 2016 20:25 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB5812D13E; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.29.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <147137910592.22871.16411946820142811060.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:25:05 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/Flq9Q4bHEmbl4tHAmYz7OP1QnmY>
Cc: isis-wg@ietf.org, chopps@chopps.org, isis-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-isis-remaining-lifetime@ietf.org
Subject: [Isis-wg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-remaining-lifetime-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 20:25:06 -0000
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-isis-remaining-lifetime-03: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-remaining-lifetime/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I have just a few minor comments: - 1, 2nd paragraph: "... the checksum field MUST NOT be altered..." That sounds more like a statement of fact than a normative requirement. -1, paragraph 4: I’m no expert here, but are where the originator might want to let the LSP expire before it becomes unreachable? (e.g. during a graceful shutdown?) -2, 4th paragraph from end: "An additional action is added: " This document adds the additional action, or ISO10589 adds it?
- Re: [Isis-wg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Isis-wg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Isis-wg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Isis-wg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Isis-wg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… Alexander Okonnikov
- Re: [Isis-wg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Isis-wg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… Alexander Okonnikov
- Re: [Isis-wg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- [Isis-wg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ie… Ben Campbell