Re: [Isis-wg] Requesting WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing-06

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 18 October 2016 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E368129890 for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1bcKQw8DaMeA for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:35:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22c.google.com (mail-oi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2732E129695 for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:35:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id y2so8733776oie.0 for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:35:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=WFADc7yV32YkZIqUFz/qDvdIwLBQR4+H7Usu0QKLGio=; b=HJoDvOF+CCZdPaHJ+HgDwBqj1oFXp/ZTmXphpdt7k/eLzT4XQEh4ofR1NAAPTh1i8k RK1lhP54obD+5I22wdVqDtdVMSc+P9nijJtf+x5miP1I4ANKKEAOA+wwJIzBt3hG3cWA mi2CBZvlchLpwA12AuL4q3f1omJJf6vEhjd0Sj5dDTKc0iOpokUvAgAOWWdWB4LuD8h/ xOerxwKxaMq0OJVqeHwA/nP3l1dMAcFkSDnasjayiVO82fQsv0Qub1VoOmAZwjxgYJVG E7spZAbf1aJHTSJTguGgPcrIrcDErEXUGImPSWVDfmYv0A9KM6vJ47VgICwpmXO9aSP7 i/QA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=WFADc7yV32YkZIqUFz/qDvdIwLBQR4+H7Usu0QKLGio=; b=dkDTjPyR2v/86W5VscsIhIXftdF1S94yDmTVxhrqWcFlwRtOcJBBEVFv1MvgWl0zFR 9Ml/tpbeWtRczn0H6kz59hZmf6czMcFxz8vQG7gW/5BiPfACsi0iYlsrA3HXnHTSB0pZ SqiNTMud01Ac/MPZ7QFTTwuSZu7pf5lBxn1QUhPblNRp2E180ENQxRhYR+2Rv9oyBmNn oN2huLYnfMaEQGkklvtW68/Zz0xYOtSdI2J3kVPZIgxZzLCGTZHpVuvvC4cRV9vYVajm Z84ZEDiTjNJ/zMU2buHIqF10d7o5V1m2zx2ZQBSBLBMhmxQRCOKjTxmt2U+V/lLOaFFC Ut9A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rm5PacMbpMNaR3R16apX20H7pgPmyJF8a8KP2Jr/qb/39Idx7QlZWsPpgwIvc80kg==
X-Received: by 10.202.56.132 with SMTP id f126mr2146616oia.73.1476826504578; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.2.8] (wsip-184-191-158-196.sd.sd.cox.net. [184.191.158.196]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f36sm13387832otf.17.2016.10.18.14.35.03 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20161018213247.GQ639535@eidolon>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:35:01 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6DB53EDB-1FDE-4B39-922B-0BABF319408A@gmail.com>
References: <20161018213247.GQ639535@eidolon>
To: David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/GxS6CszIHveKFwML42P432WHFsI>
Cc: isis-chairs@tools.ietf.org, "isis-wg@ietf.org list \(isis-wg@ietf.org\)" <isis-wg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] Requesting WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing-06
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:35:07 -0000

I would similarly favor working group adoption. I do not plan to be in Seoul at this time, but would be happy to engage in mailer discussion.

> On Oct 18, 2016, at 2:32 PM, David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net> wrote:
> 
> Hello IS-IS wg,
> 
> 
> I'd like to request/suggest WG adoption of
> 
>  draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing-06
> 
> [https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing/]
> 
> which describes the IS-IS bits of source/destination routing and would
> also like to head for early-allocation[*] of codepoints and MTID values
> (all marked "TBD" in the document).  The rtgwg counterpart,
> draft-ietf-rtgwg-dst-src-routing[-02], was adopted by rtgwg a year ago.
> 
> I'm also unaware of any IPR related to this draft, responding "no" to
> the boilerplate according to RFC 6702 Appendix A.3 :)
> 
> The -06 version is identical to -05 except for updating Fred's author
> block.  I don't expect significant changes in protocol operation and am
> unaware of open feedback in that direction (thus also the
> early-allocation request).
> 
> As there haven't been any changes I'm unsure whether I should re-present
> the document; it'd probably end up being a repeat wasting people's time
> but I'd be happy to bring it up...
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> -David
> 
> [*] early-allocation seems to not apply for blocks under "Expert Review"
>    procedure, not sure if there is a process there?