Re: [Isis-wg] Requesting WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing-06

[Fred Baker <[e-mail]>]

I would similarly favor working group adoption. I do not plan to be in Seoul at this time, but would be happy to engage in mailer discussion.

> On Oct 18, 2016, at 2:32 PM, David Lamparter <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hello IS-IS wg,
> 
> 
> I'd like to request/suggest WG adoption of
> 
>  draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing-06
> 
> [https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing/]
> 
> which describes the IS-IS bits of source/destination routing and would
> also like to head for early-allocation[*] of codepoints and MTID values
> (all marked "TBD" in the document).  The rtgwg counterpart,
> draft-ietf-rtgwg-dst-src-routing[-02], was adopted by rtgwg a year ago.
> 
> I'm also unaware of any IPR related to this draft, responding "no" to
> the boilerplate according to RFC 6702 Appendix A.3 :)
> 
> The -06 version is identical to -05 except for updating Fred's author
> block.  I don't expect significant changes in protocol operation and am
> unaware of open feedback in that direction (thus also the
> early-allocation request).
> 
> As there haven't been any changes I'm unsure whether I should re-present
> the document; it'd probably end up being a repeat wasting people's time
> but I'd be happy to bring it up...
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> -David
> 
> [*] early-allocation seems to not apply for blocks under "Expert Review"
>    procedure, not sure if there is a process there?