Re: [Isis-wg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10: (with COMMENT)

[Pushpasis Sarkar <[e-mail]>]

Hi Ben,

I have uploaded version-11 addressing all the comments below. Please let 
me know if you have any more comments.

Thanks and Regards,

-Pushpasis


On 5/4/16 4:31 AM, Ben Campbell wrote:
> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Just a couple of nits:
>
> - 4.1, last paragraph: "Each tag SHOULD be treated as an independent
> identifier that MAY be
>     used in policy to perform a policy action."
>
> I think the MAY may be spurious. It seems to be a statement of fact about
> the tag, rather than an implementation choice. (But this is a borderline
> case of spuriousness).
>
> - 8: In addition to Alvaro and Alissa's comments, remember that RFCs live
> forever. Statements that other work needs to happen will (hopefully)
> become dated. Some qualifier like "At the time of this writing..." can
> help.
>
>