Re: [Isis-wg] draft-psarkar-isis-node-admin-tag-02 WG acceptance

Hi All,

Support moving this work along.

Similar to the ospf draft[1], I have following comment...

Explicit text should be added for -
- Minimum one tag must be present in the 'Per-node Admin Tag' sub-TLV
- What happens if the implementation does not know the Interpretation
of the tag value
- No IANA registry is required to store the meaning or interpretation
of.the tag values.
- Backward compatibility behavior  - unknown sub-TLV

Nits
- Remove reference from abstract for [ISO10589],[RFC1195]
- space between 'of' and 'the' is missing in "...grouping ofthe nodes
in an IS-IS domain..."
- expand LFA,TE, on first use

Regards,
Dhruv

[1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/current/msg07118.html

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Hannes Gredler <hannes@juniper.net> wrote:
> fellow ISIS-WG,
>
> The authors have requested ISIS-WG draft-psarkar-isis-node-admin-tag-02
> as a working group document.
>
> note there has been already a decent level of discussion around applicability and use
> on the OSPF-WG mailing list. please see:
>
>   http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/current/maillist.html
>   grep for 'WG adoption of draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag'
>
> please state support/no-support.
>
> thanks,
>
> hannes & chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg