Re: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-07

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 24 November 2017 23:05 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFE4129411; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 15:05:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u1jBW-eB6TDx; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 15:05:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A61AF126DD9; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 15:05:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1470; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1511564707; x=1512774307; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=pzF5ccEiShZ1M+JnX8b7bvWQKKOlS5iPev9qdtrZ0Rs=; b=KQqeVDtkGJQ8UW5GTNpup/KAflYKBymxBjDLEkBGVXsNqwE6PMcTxZER iWZ+MWUjYmDl3lOqdYBsjGB4aBXh/r7fuytCqaYbzCIIDC2NCLxNcpl5A jZL+IBOcPzsh9xM7JdvDdbPEPIaFfipcvuibQHTmEjZ9UlgpLC+nKdj1l A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0C0AAAmpRha/4YNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYM8Zm4nB4N4ih+PFJhpghEKGAuFGAIahEQ/GAEBAQEBAQEBAWs?= =?us-ascii?q?ohSACBAEBGwYROgsQAgEIDgwCJgICAiULFRACBAENBYoiEKhRgieKeQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFgQ+CK4IHhmmFHIMVgmMFokYCh3CNGoIWhgyLLIx?= =?us-ascii?q?2iRcCERkBgTkBHzmBUG8VOYIphFV3igSBFAEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,449,1505779200"; d="scan'208";a="324687888"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 24 Nov 2017 23:05:06 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vAON56NX020225 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Nov 2017 23:05:06 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 18:05:05 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 18:05:05 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "isis-wg@ietf.org" <isis-wg@ietf.org>
CC: "isis-ads@ietf.org" <isis-ads@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-07
Thread-Index: AQHTXmMuMOokR1pbPUaPu1E7vkG+66MkNH4A
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 23:05:05 +0000
Message-ID: <D63E0C77.DB3C2%acee@cisco.com>
References: <87375fp3hv.fsf@chopps.org>
In-Reply-To: <87375fp3hv.fsf@chopps.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <C71881FE2708F04A8F4AF56889B88B5C@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/MLa0SNJb4vm08Ha-_bAWSSHFp48>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-07
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 23:05:09 -0000

Hi, 

I support publication of the subject document. I do have comments.

   1. Why do you call the reverse-metricn field, “Metric Offset”? This
sounds like a remnant of some bad 20th century CLI….
   2. Please split the single sentence description immediately following
figure 1 into multiple sentences. Maybe just refer to “Elements of
Procedure” sections rather than one incomprehensible sentence.
   3. Pervasive editorial comment, the plural of acronyms is does NOT have
an apostrophe. For example, it is TLVs, not TLV’s.

Thanks,
Acee


On 11/15/17, 5:43 PM, "Isis-wg on behalf of Christian Hopps"
<isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of chopps@chopps.org> wrote:

>
>The authors have asked for and we are starting a WG Last Call on
>
>  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric/
>
>which will last an extended 3 weeks to allow for IETF100.
>
>Thanks,
>Chris.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Isis-wg mailing list
>Isis-wg@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg