[Isis-wg] Gen-art LC review draft-ietf-isis-tlv-codepoints-00

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Sun, 20 July 2014 14:27 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369851B2C26; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 07:27:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8a-wR8MBrpIn; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 07:27:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B4991B2803; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 07:27:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-b408.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-b408.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.180.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s6KER6eb029432 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=OK); Sun, 20 Jul 2014 09:27:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <53CBD1B9.7080800@nostrum.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 10:27:05 -0400
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-isis-tlv-codepoints@tools.ietf.org, isis-wg@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/Nl7hf4LVlRzFHeXZW_SEhCDxB74
Subject: [Isis-wg] Gen-art LC review draft-ietf-isis-tlv-codepoints-00
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 14:27:09 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-isis-tlv-codepoints-00
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 20-Jul-2014
IETF LC End Date: 25-Jul-2014
IESG Telechat date: 7-Aug-2014

Summary: Basically ready for publication, but with process nits for the 
group and the IESG to consider

Thanks for assembling such a clearly written document.

The shepherd writeup should have discussed _why_ this document is 
intended for Proposed Standard.
There is no protocol definition here, and nothing to progress on the 
standards ladder. This is, instead,
primarily defining process. Why isn't this being progressed as a BCP?

Should this Update any of the RFCs that previously defined these registries?