[Isis-wg] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-05: (with COMMENT)
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 24 May 2017 10:58 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81AF6126CE8; Wed, 24 May 2017 03:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles@ietf.org, isis-chairs@ietf.org, hannes@gredler.at, isis-wg@ietf.org, mjethanandani@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.51.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <149562353143.28455.4388964904266235267.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 03:58:51 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/OQ-D_ISfluN7mBTnszmdI8_eZSQ>
Subject: [Isis-wg] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 10:58:52 -0000
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-05: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. "IPR declarations from Clarence Filsfils and Ebben Aries are missing.". Adam is right. That's a showstopper. 2. Reading the write-up: (5) Do portions of the document need review from a particular or from broader perspective, e.g., security, operational complexity, AAA, DNS, DHCP, XML, or internationalization? If so, describe the review that took place. An operational review on the question how should management of L3 bundles be handled would be a good recommendation. This is exactly what Mahesh's OPS DIR feedback is about: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-isis-l2bundles-04-opsdir-telechat-jethanandani-2017-04-20/ I've seen Les' answers. I believe those should be documented in the draft.
- [Isis-wg] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-i… Benoit Claise