[Isis-wg] Last Call request for prefix-attributes draft
"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Tue, 21 July 2015 10:38 UTC
Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395BD1B2D86 for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 03:38:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K7gyvA7BuoyE for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 03:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 296CE1B2D84 for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 03:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=625; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1437475104; x=1438684704; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=r6jCYHVFPV36HeaqkJw0NFmS97c9T30cNmFWI9uLbOU=; b=On98hjErIZGa1ZcONpok3BUW/5PODn4irN4a5G58X6ZzR0izx3OMq01Y Yy4iY44dkmvoDPEr3VyjkZLRjjIWUt6iZ8fzoB8xWVlM4U5YbSNgSbZgt NBIHXpBTUn6RteWyzZqBVz5N/m9+bF/N/hTzuhZjFYdvXGKEFMBPYwBH4 c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AaAwAyIK5V/5xdJa1cgxOBQ7wFCYd2AoE1OBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEJQEEOlEBKhRCJgEEG4gmo2ymMwEBAQEGAQEBAQEdkCGDT4EUBZFbgngBjWyEHJMvJoN8gjaBBAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,515,1432598400"; d="scan'208";a="170807250"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Jul 2015 10:38:23 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com [173.37.183.89]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6LAcNTD007931 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 10:38:23 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.220]) by xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([173.37.183.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 05:38:23 -0500
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: "isis-wg@ietf.org list" <isis-wg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Last Call request for prefix-attributes draft
Thread-Index: AdDDoU5t+d/wOexiRI+/0DUCnpe30w==
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 10:38:22 +0000
Message-ID: <F3ADE4747C9E124B89F0ED2180CC814F5949C7E8@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.24.52.132]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/OYIMAh_XbQefX2d55caTnoWvXz4>
Subject: [Isis-wg] Last Call request for prefix-attributes draft
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 10:38:25 -0000
Folks -
One thing I forgot to emphasize in my presentation regarding draft-ietf-isis-prefix-attributes-01.txt was that we are requesting last call on two documents:
draft-ietf-isis-prefix-attributes-01.txt
draft-ietf-isis-route-preference-01.txt
The latter document hasn't changed in the last two IETFs - but has a dependency on the prefix-attributes draft and so has been on hold until prefix-attributes draft was reafdy for last call.
This point is in the slides but I neglected to state it explicitly in the meeting.
Chairs - please note.
Thanx.
Apologies for any confusion.
Les
- [Isis-wg] Last Call request for prefix-attributes… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Isis-wg] Last Call request for prefix-attrib… Acee Lindem (acee)