[Isis-wg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-route-preference-02: (with COMMENT)

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 18 November 2015 04:07 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20151118040709.15883.3721.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 20:07:09 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/Oxst9vmS2q6eStw4g4wk1CyX6o0>
Cc: chopps@chopps.org, draft-ietf-isis-route-preference@ietf.org, isis-chairs@ietf.org, isis-wg@ietf.org
Subject: [Isis-wg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-route-preference-02: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-isis-route-preference-02: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-route-preference/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

A security considerations section that says "None." is pretty much the
same as not having the section. I assume that means people thought about
it, and reached the conclusion this was security neutral. It might be
helpful to at least briefly describe that thought process.

Re: [Isis-wg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Re: [Isis-wg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… Ben Campbell
[Isis-wg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ie… Ben Campbell