[Isis-wg] ISIS SR Flexible Algorithm (Resending with alias correction)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 20 November 2017 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562EE129789; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:19:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sM_ZYZddS7N5; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:19:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DF40126B7F; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:19:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1965; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1511201960; x=1512411560; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=LbYkymINBvUG5JxazXPMNiJb+nl98/Ay4lbV/HpcK20=; b=D9kBhakDaK+KSKerOxStil6WxRhDp4NR/pUG8LZTiVs3JSz2Y+mbL2kS cQQEfgXAxzx7BUm4YA3s8fh2FqpnC7+yHskNX8A93liKE9gYo3oHgJbTP hq486ku9/Z4idKvXmqKKYE9UNfK5ESsQVakYiCi9G6Dc6ugEgzmEYA8Y+ 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DgAACHGxNa/4cNJK1bGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYJKcoFULoN4ih+PKJMWhUmCEQqFOxyEZT8YAQEBAQEBAQEBax0?= =?us-ascii?q?LhRUzVhIBCwE+AgQwJwQOiUZkqFOCJ4p1AQEBAQEBBAEBAQEBAQEhgzSCB48Zg?= =?us-ascii?q?mMFoj4ClQqTTJYFAhEZAYE5AR85gXR6FYMuhF6LL4EUAQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.44,429,1505779200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="33491612"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 20 Nov 2017 18:19:19 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vAKIJJc5007183 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 20 Nov 2017 18:19:19 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 13:19:18 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 13:19:18 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "draft-hegdeppsenak-isis-sr-flex-algo@ietf.org" <draft-hegdeppsenak-isis-sr-flex-algo@ietf.org>
CC: "isis-wg@ietf.org" <isis-wg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: ISIS SR Flexible Algorithm (Resending with alias correction)
Thread-Index: AQHTYiwUorBcn9y+VUye45yg4W6jQw==
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 18:19:18 +0000
Message-ID: <D63886A4.DA829%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D63886A4DA829aceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/P_MD4M9ynL4xeDyUVfhfB8nimYc>
Subject: [Isis-wg] ISIS SR Flexible Algorithm (Resending with alias correction)
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 18:19:21 -0000

Hi Shraddha, Peter, et al,

The comment on the draft I had was that the conflict case where two ISIS routers advertise the same multi-homed prefix with a different algorithm needs to be covered. I wouldn’t try and optimize for this and would just do whatever is simplest but avoids loops (e.g., log the situation and prefer the path computed with the lowest numbered algorithm).

Thanks,
Acee