Re: [Isis-wg] ISIS SR Flexible Algorithm (Resending with alias correction)

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Mon, 20 November 2017 22:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C6C12EAB5; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 14:04:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sHZGMu6m_Dh3; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 14:04:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15B631241F5; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 14:04:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=949; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1511215479; x=1512425079; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MjTxCp3f90e3KuhnWZcwPMgUrK02Xr5AjKaHZL3bB2g=; b=HCA80oB0YJFilm5KkuE29zhqtJbDokIAjw8RYloQBUfgqMaIV3VNDPwC x7ARL1cmP44U6a83f3h8GoN3xcT0merUNtO903b0aSuHxIMhZGClLDFNi DOUcJHfYrXstsC6Lgx5aIVAPzhaltzGYn9TWpV5spZNTS/79hr9TBylZX Y=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,430,1505779200"; d="scan'208";a="340097"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Nov 2017 22:04:37 +0000
Received: from [10.60.140.59] (ams-ppsenak-nitro10.cisco.com [10.60.140.59]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vAKM4aGe000353; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 22:04:37 GMT
Message-ID: <5A13517C.8010500@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 23:04:44 +0100
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "draft-hegdeppsenak-isis-sr-flex-algo@ietf.org" <draft-hegdeppsenak-isis-sr-flex-algo@ietf.org>
CC: "isis-wg@ietf.org" <isis-wg@ietf.org>
References: <D63886A4.DA829%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D63886A4.DA829%acee@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/V6thfVZ6b1mf6zhELfDL4fKlmbE>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] ISIS SR Flexible Algorithm (Resending with alias correction)
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 22:04:40 -0000

Hi Acee,

On 20/11/17 19:19 , Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Hi Shraddha, Peter, et al,
>
> The comment on the draft I had was that the conflict case where two ISIS
> routers advertise the same multi-homed prefix with a different algorithm
> needs to be covered. I wouldn’t try and optimize for this and would just
> do whatever is simplest but avoids loops (e.g., log the situation and
> prefer the path computed with the lowest numbered algorithm).

prefix can have SIDs for many algorithms. Prefix-SID for one algorithm 
is independent and orthogonal to prefix-SID for any other algorithm.

There is no need for all sources of the multi-homed prefix to include 
the same set of Algo-SIDs. Each source can advertise an independent set.

The case is similar to Alg-0 SID, where prefix is advertised from two 
different sources and one source advertise the Alg-0 SID and other does 
not.

thanks,
Peter

>
> Thanks,
> Acee