Re: [Isis-wg] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf-04: (with COMMENT)

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Thu, 13 April 2017 00:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399E012786A; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 17:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wen4gLwNnnJX; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 17:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B65D126C83; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 17:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2393; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1492043309; x=1493252909; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=ZWSQEd/knAVmx5PnwOT6TZDOPhBvVbZlvwxfv3JnN4s=; b=jflssjXi4JX7hG86FWttBqjeLWM1x9A3DMInbI99wusx32OtqHtwY+4y ypK6XLtSq4mPwvhVNomFrOjFAiubAkXLgB0c1Blz717XF4oNn4tEDn2TO QoQ51dZcmYzif69dhW/D6XEYnaP8z12OoDLxv0Z9in4Ic/tEBhImI49qb 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AYAQCaxe5Y/5NdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBg1NhgQsHjXKRVJVZgg8hC4V4AoQCPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUVAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQMBATg0CwwEAgEIEQQBAR8JBycLFAkIAgQBDQUIig4OrAaLEQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFhlGBXYMXhCgRAU6FMwWJJ5NjAYcBi1aCCIUuiheUAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?fOH0IWxVBhRCBSnUBhnOBIYENAQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,192,1488844800"; d="scan'208";a="230424864"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Apr 2017 00:28:28 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3D0SSo0009211 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:28:28 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 19:28:27 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 19:28:27 -0500
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf@ietf.org>, "isis-chairs@ietf.org" <isis-chairs@ietf.org>, "isis-wg@ietf.org" <isis-wg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Isis-wg] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf-04: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSs9kXtB7OOTYTUUK634pAdcCLBqHCcTww
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:28:27 +0000
Message-ID: <7f09ff867584402988655c661be59d3f@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
References: <149203479830.15702.1738541399483771065.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <149203479830.15702.1738541399483771065.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.32.152.19]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/WPBaN8TjSaX-g8btgFQetad9PPs>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:28:32 -0000

Kathleen -

Thanx for the review. Inline.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Isis-wg [mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kathleen
> Moriarty
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 3:07 PM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf@ietf.org; isis-chairs@ietf.org; isis-wg@ietf.org
> Subject: [Isis-wg] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-auto-
> conf-04: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf-04: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
> paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thanks for your response and updates to the SecDir review.
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/_DxRs_eINTVE8E-
> N3S31Zr_10B8
> 
> I don't see any privacy considerations with the identifiers created, discussed
> in System ID and Router-Fingerprint Generation Considerations and Section
> 3.2.  Are they in later documents that use these identifiers?
>  I see they may not be unique in home networks, but are there
> considerations for how they might be used that need to be documented?
> Thanks in advance.

[Les:] The suggested values to be used to generate these identifiers are listed in Section 3.4.5:

  o  MAC address(es)

   o  Configured IP address(es)

   o  Hardware IDs (e.g.  CPU ID)

   o  Device serial number(s)

   o  System clock at a certain specific time

   o  Arbitrary received packet(s) on an interface(s)

(though an implementation is free to use other identifiers).

What about these suggestions indicates there is a privacy concern?

   Les

> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg