IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis-auto-conf-06

"Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com> Mon, 23 November 2015 09:54 UTC

Return-Path: <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C411A7002 for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 01:54:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.786
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.786 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id au2e8fcvKpXG for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 01:54:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED7781A7008 for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 01:54:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CAR47614; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:54:07 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML410-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.41) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:54:05 +0000
Received: from NKGEML506-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.25]) by nkgeml410-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:53:59 +0800
From: "Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
To: Marc Binderberger <marc@sniff.de>, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
Thread-Topic: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis-auto-conf-06
Thread-Index: AQHRDNdgfbfXTgMN+0+Mtdt3Qcw29Z6pABeAgACJszA=
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:53:58 +0000
Message-ID: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C234BA66@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <8737x3nf31.fsf@chopps.org> <20151123011841355148.b6e698f3@sniff.de>
In-Reply-To: <20151123011841355148.b6e698f3@sniff.de>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.98.117]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020203.5652E240.0113, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.3.25, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: cc40a566d80f5d0a74adffff1a5a66fd
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/Wwd9PyccqOda7jtN8sNZ-TQyfDA>
Cc: "draft-liu-isis-auto-conf@tools.ietf.org" <draft-liu-isis-auto-conf@tools.ietf.org>, "isis-wg@ietf.org" <isis-wg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis-auto-conf-06
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:54:15 -0000

Hi Marc,

Thanks for your comment. Please see replies inline.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Isis-wg [mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marc
> Binderberger
> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 5:19 PM
> To: Christian Hopps
> Cc: isis-wg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis-auto-conf-06
> 
> Hello Christian, authors and IS-IS experts,
> 
> with 1 month delay (sorry :-) :
> 
> I think the topic is worth to be supported by the WG.
> But - and I'm making friends now :-) - I also hope the document is
> undergoing some major discussion/cleanup before it goes "official"; 
[Bing] For my understanding, "WG adoption" does not necessarily mean the content in the draft is already "official".
I guess what you meant by "official" might refer to the phase that the draft is to be submitted to the IESG. Before that, it should be quite normal that we can continue improving the draft after adoption, and the authors would be glad to hear your comments and discuss with you in technical details.
So, in this sense, can I assume you actually support the adoption, but you have some technical concerns that you expect to be addressed?
(To chairs: correct me if my understanding was not decent.)

Best regards,
Bing

> my
> impression is the "fingerprint" idea is not well-defined in this draft (in
> contrast to RFC7503).
> 
> 
> Regards, Marc
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 07:38:26 -0700, Christian Hopps wrote:
> >
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > The authors have requested the IS-IS WG adopt:
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-isis-auto-conf/
> >
> > as a working group document.
> >
> > Please indicate support or no-support for taking on this work.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chris.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Isis-wg mailing list
> > Isis-wg@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email