Re: [Isis-wg] draft-psarkar-isis-node-admin-tag-02 WG acceptance

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Mon, 29 September 2014 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6746E1A8774 for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.287
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.287 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vS8-MCJDXB7q for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 859D31A1B45 for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1733; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1412007891; x=1413217491; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=N71jtffTU3tXptHBZagQhWEJo4bkNwuQPkt85OYKSfs=; b=a+XNdpO0e0Nd3ogqdSBMbvc5CZ1ViaO1wv1uSv108oG1ArufbosmO+gf f2i+qec5+oAVW1fuFlUJjDRmwp+jmvhnyXYz8Zrht8F1cy6VSz46LhCCr fwSVACjhM9tYJRM8xrl5N3ZAZl+L8bRteECo1R/PVmsgEhrU+N/5Ag34j w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah0FAP+GKVStJV2b/2dsb2JhbABggmsjU1cEygsKh04CgRIWAXuEAwEBAQQBAQE3NAsMBAIBCBEEAQELFAkHJwsUCQgCBAENBQgBiDUBDL80ARePTQEBHjECBQaDKIEdBZFloSCDY2wBgQ45gQIBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,620,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="359209643"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2014 16:24:49 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com [173.36.12.87]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8TGOmm1008313 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:24:48 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([fe80::8c1c:7b85:56de:ffd1]) by xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com ([173.36.12.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 11:24:48 -0500
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: Hannes Gredler <hannes@juniper.net>, "isis-wg@ietf.org list" <isis-wg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Isis-wg] draft-psarkar-isis-node-admin-tag-02 WG acceptance
Thread-Index: AQHP28P8/MIwnB1jyE6OEDyTAcu145wYSuaA
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:24:47 +0000
Message-ID: <F3ADE4747C9E124B89F0ED2180CC814F3D7AD60C@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <20140929090043.GA65720@hannes-mba.local>
In-Reply-To: <20140929090043.GA65720@hannes-mba.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.88.108]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/Xv0Xqi123mJyo7khit9twnPy5hc
Cc: "draft-psarkar-isis-node-admin-tag@tools.ietf.org" <draft-psarkar-isis-node-admin-tag@tools.ietf.org>, Christian Hopps <chopps@rawdofmt.org>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] draft-psarkar-isis-node-admin-tag-02 WG acceptance
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:24:52 -0000

I support making this a WG document - but I have the same concern which I previously expressed regarding the companion OSPF document i.e. a much more complete discussion regarding the tradeoffs between using node tags vs capability identifiers needs to be included .

As Hannes has referenced there has been a lively discussion of this point on the OSPF-WG list - all of which I think is applicable to the IS-IS draft. It would be good if any discussion of that issue in the future was copied to both lists.

Also, I would prefer that the Applications content which is found in Section 5 of http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag-02.txt be repeated in the IS-IS draft rather than referenced.

   Les


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Isis-wg [mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes
> Gredler
> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 2:01 AM
> To: isis-wg@ietf.org list
> Cc: draft-psarkar-isis-node-admin-tag@tools.ietf.org; Christian Hopps
> Subject: [Isis-wg] draft-psarkar-isis-node-admin-tag-02 WG acceptance
> 
> fellow ISIS-WG,
> 
> The authors have requested ISIS-WG draft-psarkar-isis-node-admin-tag-02
> as a working group document.
> 
> note there has been already a decent level of discussion around
> applicability and use
> on the OSPF-WG mailing list. please see:
> 
>   http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/current/maillist.html
>   grep for 'WG adoption of draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag'
> 
> please state support/no-support.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> hannes & chris
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg