Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing-06

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Thu, 08 December 2016 22:23 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D6C129590; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 14:23:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K249z5Z_AbeH; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 14:23:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 922AE129B3B; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 14:20:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id n21so30505qka.3; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 14:20:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qEDerD7Uuj61joLsCTlXLIDEUmrbZiqk1FClBn9gUIQ=; b=F/H7v6sZof7mRIz9b3YK2uhqNnOLSxZWl9dEnLk+U2Ojb47YOUTcBvN1JaXI31nGpK nJIn74HnXZS2OUou59E6UM1AQFaeENLqBUCJpvOdNfsTTma44lDEctntDW0R4jpVjDk/ jgRM3zIrFkumJEMJ1mqnND+4KHlmzAKzDiqdkwuzLaFvctKiylPT7gxxngiaCB5NRJHK urNOnY33zrazv2S9yLJNwzZYnE2nlAsQ+sxk9tO/FjkjXLr2pJ4u1ut9OHHy7Hq3SHL2 9od8zvhHIkvWPYmX97Pi+S0IUIJrjCEAKz23MnqZmHwUOog10/97q2f33XBQ1tZRmYNr Kv+Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qEDerD7Uuj61joLsCTlXLIDEUmrbZiqk1FClBn9gUIQ=; b=jCWhUQFrFa425ZojA4B51HHcfRuXwpz0Aw4zPcFc9DWjUJyQUMi1FLv8uo7jXBID1d 94tiBC1GB+tFEBTFEB32RTpiQptn8kJtfZLBgrBSsK0uuCFbTAZOBEAdEiMJp5h4EEtJ aGdfVwQGdj62NHXwSKKrJ5pU2X/3VMQWvNOf5Qib4U60jz77GQCZSzkHPFNV3KZeWdVF lW6KGjTXRKUNKb56Kv5WGevdgdC5judeLdQeVc0KhUaGQ+K4UiaMuzbEMmTacOol5eXR +Y/CaPXFMelrvm/zN2XGYF15YbesDixu6oN6McXI24h9AGB9naPDmDhMBiQkMPJempP6 vlGw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00V9KU5PvzCjdx6Yvn1Kiu6YGZi8ye+0ZlUSCE92Efu5/cuk8gmP6FrFj6H5o98h0oisS7HjnrMuUZcOg==
X-Received: by 10.55.200.27 with SMTP id c27mr63060726qkj.276.1481235610738; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 14:20:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.45.14 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 14:20:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <bd7b097f8338490f906a6af6269794a9@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
References: <87d1i34dgr.fsf@chopps.org> <CA+wi2hOJn4v=yUb3CwwUatRLJZMkNo+BEWu+ogshynB6yisj2w@mail.gmail.com> <bb57c3e950e547c68032cd7b32e1c1c3@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <CAG4d1re7fwdyhiWkko2fb10ZLbyhi-883ivbi1pnQ9Z0Fi69ag@mail.gmail.com> <bd7b097f8338490f906a6af6269794a9@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 17:20:09 -0500
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rejytYnnpMcJm1Q9yxv_X0RjGmdW3LBCJhJOH6H6reh1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1582c68307c05432d0ad9
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/YXYlblWPXGt23f4p8C7Edm7cppQ>
Cc: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "isis-wg@ietf.org" <isis-wg@ietf.org>, "draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing@ietf.org" <draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing-06
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 22:23:14 -0000

Les,

I don't personally.  I'm still poking and hearing there is the problem.

Regards,
Alia

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg@cisco.com>
wrote:

> Alia –
>
>
>
> I am aware of the RTGWG work – I am asking do we have reason to believe
> that there will be devices running IS-IS that require this support.
>
> If you have some information on this I would be interested to see it.
>
>
>
>    Les
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Alia Atlas [mailto:akatlas@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 08, 2016 12:40 PM
> *To:* Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> *Cc:* Tony Przygienda; Christian Hopps; isis-wg@ietf.org;
> draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing@ietf.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-
> routing-06
>
>
>
> Les,
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <
> ginsberg@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> I think the bigger question – from the standpoint of WG adoption – is do
> we really believe there is a need for this extension?
>
>
>
> There was a time when IS-IS was being considered as the homenet protocol –
> that ship seems to have sailed.
>
> So the question becomes do we really think there is a deployment where
> these extensions will be needed? If the answer to that is yes, then I am
> convinced that the direction this draft has taken is the right one and we
> should then do the diligence necessary to finish the job.
>
> But if the answer is “no” then this does not seem a worthwhile use of our
> time.
>
>
>
> Have you been following the discussion in RTGWG around
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bowbakova-rtgwg-
> enterprise-pa-multihoming/
>
> and https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-dst-src-routing/
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-dst-src-routing/>  ?
>
>
>
> The issues around IPv6 multihoming are not primarily related to homenet -
> though homenet also has those same issues.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Alia
>
>
>
>
>
> David (and/or others) – can you comment on this?
>
>
>
>    Les
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Isis-wg [mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Tony
> Przygienda
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 08, 2016 11:25 AM
> *To:* Christian Hopps
> *Cc:* isis-wg@ietf.org; draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-
> routing-06
>
>
>
> I sent good amount of comments on the draft a while ago. While I support
> adoption I think those need addressing to ensure correctness of the draft
> ... tony
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:27 AM, <chopps@chopps.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> The authors of draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing-06 have requested
> WG adoption. Please indicate whether you support adoption of this work
> (some folks already have on the list). This is a 2 week call ending
> Thursday, November 24th, 2016.
>
> Can the authors also reply to this mail indicating whether they know of
> any IPR related to this draft?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *We’ve heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce
> the complete works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know
> that is not true.*
>
> —Robert Wilensky
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
>
>
>