RE: [Isis-wg] Computation of areas in MT-ISIS

"May Lu" <mlu@chiaro.com> Mon, 10 October 2005 16:21 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EP0PW-0007Ao-GN; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:21:58 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EP0PV-0007Aj-La for isis-wg@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:21:57 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA04065 for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:21:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rchss002.chiaro.com ([63.88.196.82]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EP0ZQ-0000iA-OI for isis-wg@ietf.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:32:14 -0400
Received: from rchst007.cus.chiaro.com ([192.168.8.120]) by rchss002.chiaro.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j9AGGcaj015604; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 11:16:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mlu@chiaro.com)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Isis-wg] Computation of areas in MT-ISIS
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 11:20:34 -0500
Message-ID: <34B6386F843340459B22F59DFF7B12FF0295032F@192-168-240-22.chiaro.com>
Thread-Topic: [Isis-wg] Computation of areas in MT-ISIS
Thread-Index: AcXLxXO1x4FO1QcoS2OUiWr7hb9V9AB5WaGw
From: May Lu <mlu@chiaro.com>
To: Naiming Shen <naiming@cisco.com>, "Pudiyapura, Ajeer" <Ajeer.Pudiyapura@tellabs.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9a2be21919e71dc6faef12b370c4ecf5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org

If a MT-ISIS node runs different protocols on its interfaces, how does the node broadcast its union address in L2 LSP?

See configuration below:

       Node1(area 01, 04) ----  Node2 (area 01, 02) --- Node3 (area 02, 05)
                                        IP                               Ipv6

      All three nodes are MT-ISIS nodes. Node2 is connected to Node1 with IP protocol. Node2 and Node3 are connected with IPV6 protocol. Node2 IP union addresses should be 01, 02 and 04. Node2 Ipv6 union addresses should be 01, 02 and 05. Is this correct?

      If the union address does not consider the protocol, in the following case, there is a problem:

             Node1 (area 01)  ------ Node2 (area 01) ----- Node3 (area 01, 02)
                                        IP                              Ipv6
      All three nodes are MT-ISIS nodes. Node1 and Node2 are connected via IP protocol. Node2 and Node3 are connected via Ipv6 protocol. Node1 is a level1 only node. Node2's union addresses are 01 and 02. Node2 will set attached bit on IP protocol and Node1 will set the IP default route towards Node2. Actually Node1 and Node2 are using the same area address in IP network and Node1 shouldn't set default route to Node2.

Thanks,
- Xiaomei Lu

 
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Naiming Shen [mailto:naiming@cisco.com] 
Sent:	Saturday, October 08, 2005 12:01 AM
To:	Pudiyapura, Ajeer
Cc:	isis-wg@ietf.org
Subject:	Re: [Isis-wg] Computation of areas in MT-ISIS



Pudiyapura, Ajeer said the following on 10/06/2005 11:09 AM:
> Hi.
> 
>  
> 
>   I have the following questions:
> 
>  
> 
> 1)       How is Area Address Computation (section 7.2.11 of ISO/IEC 
> 10589) done in Multi Topology IS-IS? Are they computed separately for 
> each topology?
> 

No. MT-ISIS node keeps the same system-id, areas, levels, hostname,
etc. there is no change to any of that.

thanks.
- Naiming

> 2)       If so, how is the resulting set advertised in L2 LSPs since 
> there is no mechanism to do this per topology?
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -Ajeer Pudiyapura
> 
>  
> 
> ============================================================
> The information contained in this message may be privileged
> and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee
> or agent responsible for delivering this message to the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reproduction,
> dissemination or distribution of this communication is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
> please notify us immediately by replying to the message and
> deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Tellabs
> ============================================================
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg

_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
Isis-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg


_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
Isis-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg