Re: [Isis-wg] latest update of draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions

Hannes Gredler <hannes@juniper.net> Thu, 21 May 2015 13:27 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB171A0398; Thu, 21 May 2015 06:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id har_z0KCSnbk; Thu, 21 May 2015 06:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0108.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 726A91A1BA2; Thu, 21 May 2015 06:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=hannes@juniper.net;
Received: from hannes-mba.local (193.110.55.11) by DM2PR05MB446.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.104.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.166.22; Thu, 21 May 2015 13:27:00 +0000
Received: from hannes-mba.local (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by hannes-mba.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96840136265A; Thu, 21 May 2015 15:26:47 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 15:26:47 +0200
From: Hannes Gredler <hannes@juniper.net>
To: "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <20150521132647.GB62835@hannes-mba.local>
References: <20150506165154.GB1769@hannes-mba.local> <F3ADE4747C9E124B89F0ED2180CC814F593BFB40@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com> <20150507120728.GB3896@hannes-mba.local> <F3ADE4747C9E124B89F0ED2180CC814F593C4EE2@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com> <20150514195127.GB26771@hannes-mba.local> <F3ADE4747C9E124B89F0ED2180CC814F593D2E51@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com> <20150518131042.GA37696@hannes-mba.local> <D3583CD5-2522-432F-BBC8-4F730E37F9C2@cisco.com> <20150520162058.GE55346@hannes-mba.local> <3A2A07D9-AA43-496E-83FE-642A935D59F9@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3A2A07D9-AA43-496E-83FE-642A935D59F9@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Originating-IP: [193.110.55.11]
X-ClientProxiedBy: HE1PR02CA0038.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (25.162.33.48) To DM2PR05MB446.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.104.142)
X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DM2PR05MB446;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <DM2PR05MB4468CEED8AE621EEC75B834CBC10@DM2PR05MB446.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:;
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:DM2PR05MB446; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM2PR05MB446;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 0583A86C08
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(24454002)(189002)(199003)(93886004)(50466002)(68736005)(92566002)(83506001)(46102003)(122386002)(77156002)(40100003)(87976001)(64706001)(2950100001)(122856001)(47776003)(230783001)(110136002)(46406003)(50986999)(86362001)(5001830100001)(189998001)(33656002)(5001860100001)(101416001)(98436002)(105586002)(23726002)(77096005)(66066001)(106356001)(76506005)(5001960100002)(76176999)(54356999)(62966003)(97756001)(4001540100001)(81156007)(97736004)(4001350100001)(579124003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR05MB446; H:hannes-mba.local; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 May 2015 13:27:00.8961 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM2PR05MB446
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/_KI0GwG28-O3wpenAG0Ow3HICDQ>
Cc: "Les Ginsberg \(ginsberg\)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, "<spring@ietf.org>" <spring@ietf.org>, "isis-wg@ietf.org list" <isis-wg@ietf.org>, "Clarence Filsfils \(cfilsfil\)" <cfilsfil@cisco.com>, Christian Hopps <chopps@rawdofmt.org>, "bruno.decraene@orange.com IMT/OLN" <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] latest update of draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 13:27:05 -0000

hi stefano,

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:14:20AM +0000, Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) wrote:
[ ... ]
| > | SP> why not creating a new thread explaining the issue and including isis and spring wg ?
| > 
| > HG> thats a good suggestion  - please do it ! - 
| > HG> we need to be clear on the protocol requirements *before* adding
| > HG> protocol extensions.
| 
| SP> well, we agreed already at multiple occasions (last one was during the meeting in Dallas
| SP> where you and me agreed to add MT support to the Binding TLV) so we're inline with the process, right ? 

again this is meant as a friendly reminder to document (e.g. in some of the SPRING documents
where you have the pen) how you want to intend to use the MT extensions for the binding TLV.

its not yet clear to me and i'd like to get an answer on this before progressing the
protocol extensions in the ISIS and OSPF working groups.

/hannes