[Isis-wg] Alvaro Retana's Yes on draft-ietf-isis-sbfd-discriminator-02: (with COMMENT)

"Alvaro Retana" <aretana@cisco.com> Thu, 24 March 2016 16:27 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E955212D152; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 09:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.17.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160324162707.3891.57431.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 09:27:07 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/aWHsLJ5W1fkIjgZyFkVQfpOa7Lg>
Cc: draft-ietf-isis-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org, chopps@chopps.org, isis-chairs@ietf.org, isis-wg@ietf.org
Subject: [Isis-wg] Alvaro Retana's Yes on draft-ietf-isis-sbfd-discriminator-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:27:08 -0000

Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-isis-sbfd-discriminator-02: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-sbfd-discriminator/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The BFD WG has come to consensus on the path forward resulting in the
requirement to know about discriminators assigned, and not explicit
mapping to individual functions.  The base S-BFD document
(draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-base) has been updated appropriately.

I'm clearing my DISCUSS.