IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Isis-wg] Regarding the use case about ISIS FlowSpec

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 10 November 2015 03:25 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBDF51B3011 for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 19:25:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LwoEVQb8fdp7 for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 19:25:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CF5C1B3010 for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 19:25:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6123; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1447125958; x=1448335558; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=HRKxvnPUl/ZRmBosz9yI4UU1Uq7E1ewNfgjIbW4Fsac=; b=U5Hgl8zWp/uu2mQRxia9bl6ZJsxmcoTuOn+UakQPdNwmZK80UznbWGiN /NdyvFZ27y16lk/reiO+vj5akUzazLJ+PVkiTY697Esb/Gk3d3nyaWSng mG+bq7XVpsPqTnmRlUgr8mn/mZp+TDA8kKAi2WOLtN0DYmjWnrt7c5LLa o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AFAgDrYkFW/5BdJa1egm5NgUIGrmyNNYIaAQ2BY4YQAhyBJjgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhDUBAQEEI0geAgEIEQMBAigDAgICMBQJCAIEARKIGQMSsSOQWQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEai1KCU4IognqBRAWWSAGLMoF0lHKHUgEfAQFChARyhCeBBwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,268,1444694400"; d="scan'208,217";a="206715966"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2015 03:25:57 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-018.cisco.com (xch-rtp-018.cisco.com [64.101.220.158]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tAA3PvPK026877 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 03:25:57 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-018.cisco.com (64.101.220.158) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 22:25:56 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 22:25:56 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com" <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>, isis-wg <isis-wg@ietf.org>, youjianjie <youjianjie@huawei.com>, liangqiandeng <liangqiandeng@huawei.com>, "Keyur Patel (keyupate)" <keyupate@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [Isis-wg] Regarding the use case about ISIS FlowSpec
Thread-Index: AQHRG1eqk92vp6EWzU2awDXQGFt3156UmFCA
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 03:25:56 +0000
Message-ID: <D266CD17.3CF4F%acee@cisco.com>
References: <BLU437-SMTP47F7FBB7D5B4D64469B9E5FC140@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU437-SMTP47F7FBB7D5B4D64469B9E5FC140@phx.gbl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.203]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D266CD173CF4Faceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/bZLZyqeLXtLReJeyQ2a3k8oYMJg>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] Regarding the use case about ISIS FlowSpec
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 03:26:00 -0000

Hi Zhenqiang,
Have you deployed Flow Spec advertised in IS-IS for the purpose of DDoS mitigation?
Thanks,
Acee


From: Isis-wg <isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of "li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com<mailto:li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>" <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com<mailto:li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>>
Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 at 10:36 AM
To: isis-wg <isis-wg@ietf.org<mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>>, Jianjie You <youjianjie@huawei.com<mailto:youjianjie@huawei.com>>, liangqiandeng <liangqiandeng@huawei.com<mailto:liangqiandeng@huawei.com>>, "Keyur Patel (keyupate)" <keyupate@cisco.com<mailto:keyupate@cisco.com>>
Subject: [Isis-wg] Regarding the use case about ISIS FlowSpec

Hello ISIS experts and draft authors,

I am Zhenqiang Li from China Mobile.
At the IETF meeting in Japan last week, during ISIS WG, the question was raised about  a customer interest. Actually, China Mobile deployed this in small scale MAN.

Regards,
________________________________
li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com<mailto:li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email