Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis-auto-conf-06

Marc Binderberger <marc@sniff.de> Mon, 23 November 2015 11:07 UTC

Return-Path: <marc@sniff.de>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8231F1B2DFD for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 03:07:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.135
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.135 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Io0tCDDrybuk for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 03:07:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from door.sniff.de (door.sniff.de [82.212.219.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1D61B2DFA for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 03:07:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.sniff.de [127.0.0.1]) by door.sniff.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF392AA0F; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:07:26 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 03:07:25 -0800
From: Marc Binderberger <marc@sniff.de>
To: Liubing <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20151123030725432500.990810ef@sniff.de>
In-Reply-To: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C234BA66@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <8737x3nf31.fsf@chopps.org> <20151123011841355148.b6e698f3@sniff.de> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C234BA66@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: GyazMail version 1.5.16
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/exRjyk6d92NwtwKbrsM8hWhtHOQ>
Cc: "draft-liu-isis-auto-conf@tools.ietf.org" <draft-liu-isis-auto-conf@tools.ietf.org>, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "isis-wg@ietf.org" <isis-wg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis-auto-conf-06
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:07:35 -0000

Hello Bing and chairs,

ah sorry, I did not want to cause confusion. I support the draft.

With "official" I meant "to be submitted into the RFC queue". Before that I 
think more discussion is required.


Regards, Marc



On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:53:58 +0000, Liubing (Leo) wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> 
> Thanks for your comment. Please see replies inline.
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Isis-wg [mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marc
>> Binderberger
>> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 5:19 PM
>> To: Christian Hopps
>> Cc: isis-wg@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis-auto-conf-06
>> 
>> Hello Christian, authors and IS-IS experts,
>> 
>> with 1 month delay (sorry :-) :
>> 
>> I think the topic is worth to be supported by the WG.
>> But - and I'm making friends now :-) - I also hope the document is
>> undergoing some major discussion/cleanup before it goes "official"; 
> [Bing] For my understanding, "WG adoption" does not necessarily mean the 
> content in the draft is already "official".
> I guess what you meant by "official" might refer to the phase that the 
> draft is to be submitted to the IESG. Before that, it should be quite 
> normal that we can continue improving the draft after adoption, and the 
> authors would be glad to hear your comments and discuss with you in 
> technical details.
> So, in this sense, can I assume you actually support the adoption, but you 
> have some technical concerns that you expect to be addressed?
> (To chairs: correct me if my understanding was not decent.)
> 
> Best regards,
> Bing
> 
>> my
>> impression is the "fingerprint" idea is not well-defined in this draft (in
>> contrast to RFC7503).
>> 
>> 
>> Regards, Marc
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 07:38:26 -0700, Christian Hopps wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Folks,
>>> 
>>> The authors have requested the IS-IS WG adopt:
>>> 
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-isis-auto-conf/
>>> 
>>> as a working group document.
>>> 
>>> Please indicate support or no-support for taking on this work.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chris.
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Isis-wg mailing list
>>> Isis-wg@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Isis-wg mailing list
>> Isis-wg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
>