Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis-auto-conf-06
Marc Binderberger <marc@sniff.de> Mon, 23 November 2015 11:07 UTC
Return-Path: <marc@sniff.de>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8231F1B2DFD for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 03:07:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.135
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.135 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Io0tCDDrybuk for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 03:07:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from door.sniff.de (door.sniff.de [82.212.219.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1D61B2DFA for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 03:07:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.sniff.de [127.0.0.1]) by door.sniff.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF392AA0F; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:07:26 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 03:07:25 -0800
From: Marc Binderberger <marc@sniff.de>
To: Liubing <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20151123030725432500.990810ef@sniff.de>
In-Reply-To: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C234BA66@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <8737x3nf31.fsf@chopps.org> <20151123011841355148.b6e698f3@sniff.de> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C234BA66@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: GyazMail version 1.5.16
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/exRjyk6d92NwtwKbrsM8hWhtHOQ>
Cc: "draft-liu-isis-auto-conf@tools.ietf.org" <draft-liu-isis-auto-conf@tools.ietf.org>, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "isis-wg@ietf.org" <isis-wg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis-auto-conf-06
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:07:35 -0000
Hello Bing and chairs, ah sorry, I did not want to cause confusion. I support the draft. With "official" I meant "to be submitted into the RFC queue". Before that I think more discussion is required. Regards, Marc On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:53:58 +0000, Liubing (Leo) wrote: > Hi Marc, > > Thanks for your comment. Please see replies inline. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Isis-wg [mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marc >> Binderberger >> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 5:19 PM >> To: Christian Hopps >> Cc: isis-wg@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis-auto-conf-06 >> >> Hello Christian, authors and IS-IS experts, >> >> with 1 month delay (sorry :-) : >> >> I think the topic is worth to be supported by the WG. >> But - and I'm making friends now :-) - I also hope the document is >> undergoing some major discussion/cleanup before it goes "official"; > [Bing] For my understanding, "WG adoption" does not necessarily mean the > content in the draft is already "official". > I guess what you meant by "official" might refer to the phase that the > draft is to be submitted to the IESG. Before that, it should be quite > normal that we can continue improving the draft after adoption, and the > authors would be glad to hear your comments and discuss with you in > technical details. > So, in this sense, can I assume you actually support the adoption, but you > have some technical concerns that you expect to be addressed? > (To chairs: correct me if my understanding was not decent.) > > Best regards, > Bing > >> my >> impression is the "fingerprint" idea is not well-defined in this draft (in >> contrast to RFC7503). >> >> >> Regards, Marc >> >> >> >> On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 07:38:26 -0700, Christian Hopps wrote: >>> >>> Hi Folks, >>> >>> The authors have requested the IS-IS WG adopt: >>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-isis-auto-conf/ >>> >>> as a working group document. >>> >>> Please indicate support or no-support for taking on this work. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Chris. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Isis-wg mailing list >>> Isis-wg@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Isis-wg mailing list >> Isis-wg@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg > > _______________________________________________ > Isis-wg mailing list > Isis-wg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg >
- [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis-aut… Christian Hopps
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis… bruno.decraene
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis… Mach Chen
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis… David Lamparter
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis… Ian Farrer
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis… Liubing (Leo)
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis… Christian Franke
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis… Marc Binderberger
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis… Liubing (Leo)
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis… Marc Binderberger
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis… Liubing (Leo)
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption Call for draft-liu-isis… Christian Hopps