Re: [Isis-wg] [OSPF] Comments on draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-01

Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com> Fri, 13 June 2014 05:45 UTC

Return-Path: <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012F51B28E2; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 22:45:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.852
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kT2KbE0XjZHH; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 22:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BAEF1A036C; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 22:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BIJ32323; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 05:45:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.37) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 06:45:44 +0100
Received: from NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.62]) by nkgeml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.37]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 13:45:38 +0800
From: Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
To: Hannes Gredler <hannes@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Comments on draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-01
Thread-Index: Ac+GJni8pnqnrJn8Sty9J1EyPVqh3v//gr+AgAAZ8QD//lSTsA==
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 05:45:37 +0000
Message-ID: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE082806E3@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE08280249@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com> <442F4557-73F8-46B3-8ED7-E3E4BECF3523@cisco.com> <349E5A21-A323-4D05-9ABB-CC6642E51E0D@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <349E5A21-A323-4D05-9ABB-CC6642E51E0D@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.98.134]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/f6eWWpm6Bvj-YI2lnFlreI714a4
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>, "isis-wg@ietf.org list" <isis-wg@ietf.org>, "Stefano Previdi \(sprevidi\)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] [OSPF] Comments on draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-01
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 05:45:50 -0000

Hi Hannes,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannes Gredler [mailto:hannes@juniper.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 8:15 PM
> To: Xuxiaohu
> Cc: OSPF List; isis-wg@ietf.org list; Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)
> Subject: Re: [OSPF] Comments on draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-01
> 
> 
> On Jun 12, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) wrote:
> >> 5. The lack of MT-ID field in the SID/Label Binding TLV
> >>
> >> I had suggested to add an MT-ID field in the SID/Label Binding TLV and
> Stefano had agreed to that suggestion. But it seems that the MT-ID field has not
> been added yet.
> >
> >
> > I agree with you but since the binding TLV was not originally part of
> > the SR proposal (i.e.: it's the merge with Hannes draft) I'd let
> > Hannes to comment.
> 
> 
> no concerns from my side, we can add a MTID subTLV to specify what topology
> an advertised path does belong to.

That would be great.

Best regards,
Xiaohu

> do you want to send text for the suggested change or shall i give a stab at it ?
> 
> /hannes