Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing-06

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Thu, 08 December 2016 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE6B129699; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:39:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3flKv1zoJygI; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:39:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com (mail-qk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A70F129575; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:39:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id q130so274009733qke.1; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 12:39:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=prdkkXBT8u/zDzGZn1X4jKWYEpAipDNrYKqNUlbwOT0=; b=FEDnEosu55H7TZDNIrpaJMRw5+1yZGOLMfLt5C8JLNRVq/lElkMniKr0jIt1E5g8VE AyjSathiD7tIbRehYyR6cnhgPX/qGTVBvBQPOmHR8FuMx5xHrJo5IqIqENi39E0cAYH5 A680Jr/RC6JxxSPWzqspRg6UHIgaV3bAsyFC1WasvuGTpobrxyIYpT8BU3Nq/gGvdDLS n5HmLPCHq83IR2BH5ZuyJnEkxKxeNNrKL2H+7Zs3AXjtDfRX2Sphrqa/iFXDx7gAq7TE ZOIk/+MIot6EVbeGYgfrJNsa4WeO3ZnrCbj+5KTScy2FCRvW+rNISYZ/T9cJq6+609ea tpQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=prdkkXBT8u/zDzGZn1X4jKWYEpAipDNrYKqNUlbwOT0=; b=EaCmVIoKvzwsxP4/Zwio1cBrmM146vElLkwt6PBXydhoQj1OALmtAwaO97LKfUAz4P X7r6gPePZiuMYyAsYhauuB/5eRt6m/XKkF+lL6zMi++yFWGW0LBLx5aRP6DAYLJFKMjM UNTmac9PAmfOIB0lLUFELgkPom3TJNVGiYw2ZsL4wfNwYt7SkNDUXpS8Ny+8SFBETZGo XvO/ksIlkn6a5kuS5a+B0ZsxBOIXRwReRQjQvalSLd5dHaiTz6luiIq2xr6quvMuIKWz tJEhdVAihm62+C1R3MXREM3lWxTC+Gmr7K2M3Ls3YQHt7XWqIJBSoGDSSXsUmlfr0Yr+ 1dwA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01VY+7YeUEfJT/FnyBNYewB4kd0WBSFo60CUX3wlwjD4Fcz0wF//Dk9x9fA4exwi5KKpvqQ4Vf6Oo1ytQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.92.199 with SMTP id q190mr65146895qkb.303.1481229588779; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 12:39:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.45.14 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:39:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <bb57c3e950e547c68032cd7b32e1c1c3@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
References: <87d1i34dgr.fsf@chopps.org> <CA+wi2hOJn4v=yUb3CwwUatRLJZMkNo+BEWu+ogshynB6yisj2w@mail.gmail.com> <bb57c3e950e547c68032cd7b32e1c1c3@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 15:39:48 -0500
Message-ID: <CAG4d1re7fwdyhiWkko2fb10ZLbyhi-883ivbi1pnQ9Z0Fi69ag@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114e6506786f4905432ba3d6
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/jamdlJKz2LAKW-PWgndzUIfAT4o>
Cc: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "isis-wg@ietf.org" <isis-wg@ietf.org>, "draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing@ietf.org" <draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing-06
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 20:39:52 -0000

Les,

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg@cisco.com>
wrote:

> I think the bigger question – from the standpoint of WG adoption – is do
> we really believe there is a need for this extension?
>
>
>
> There was a time when IS-IS was being considered as the homenet protocol –
> that ship seems to have sailed.
>
> So the question becomes do we really think there is a deployment where
> these extensions will be needed? If the answer to that is yes, then I am
> convinced that the direction this draft has taken is the right one and we
> should then do the diligence necessary to finish the job.
>
> But if the answer is “no” then this does not seem a worthwhile use of our
> time.
>
>
Have you been following the discussion in RTGWG around
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bowbakova-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming/
and https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-dst-src-routing/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-dst-src-routing/>  ?

The issues around IPv6 multihoming are not primarily related to homenet -
though homenet also has those same issues.

Regards,
Alia


David (and/or others) – can you comment on this?
>
>
>
>    Les
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Isis-wg [mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Tony
> Przygienda
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 08, 2016 11:25 AM
> *To:* Christian Hopps
> *Cc:* isis-wg@ietf.org; draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-
> routing-06
>
>
>
> I sent good amount of comments on the draft a while ago. While I support
> adoption I think those need addressing to ensure correctness of the draft
> ... tony
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:27 AM, <chopps@chopps.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> The authors of draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing-06 have requested
> WG adoption. Please indicate whether you support adoption of this work
> (some folks already have on the list). This is a 2 week call ending
> Thursday, November 24th, 2016.
>
> Can the authors also reply to this mail indicating whether they know of
> any IPR related to this draft?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *We’ve heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce
> the complete works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know
> that is not true.*
>
> —Robert Wilensky
>
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
>
>