[Isis-wg] ISIS SR Flexible Algorithm

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 20 November 2017 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0745212E055 for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:17:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iLw32nUm0_kc for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:17:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5699A129789 for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:17:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1965; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1511201867; x=1512411467; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=k2vAGEleXBPy9WucSz/jhQx+tJKeWvX/9/HxDPL9rXE=; b=ay5T0+1WZudKYwi0Cb6hsCDd3m1ZaYQwdpIDbHzjCMD6VgqRCLziQ+rd 8h8bhfZjLypfij6o+OkZEXXb/O/641261wyJDKRzzD+EinNy4vX5agLMX UWDjV/0BAicWhw87Z4A7bD8F7PCqOLvk7eUdUxix83Qs5oDbE8gKv+pUB g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DgAACHGxNa/4gNJK1bGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJKcoFULoN4ih+PKJMWhUmCEQqFOxyEZT8YAQEBAQEBAQEBax0LhRUzVhIBCwE+AgQwJwQOiUZkqFOCJ4p1AQEBAQEBAQMBAQEBAQEBIYM0ggePGYJjBaI+ApUKk0yWBQIRGQGBOQEfOYF0ehWDLoReiy+BFAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,429,1505779200"; d="scan'208,217";a="326539058"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 20 Nov 2017 18:17:46 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vAKIHjMV001432 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 20 Nov 2017 18:17:46 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 13:17:45 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 13:17:45 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "draft-hegdeppsenak-isis-sr-flex-algo@ietf.orig" <draft-hegdeppsenak-isis-sr-flex-algo@ietf.orig>
CC: "isis-wg@ietf.org" <isis-wg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: ISIS SR Flexible Algorithm
Thread-Index: AQHTYivcV7sD67jeFUSPb8kbXpf9eA==
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 18:17:45 +0000
Message-ID: <D6388670.DA826%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D6388670DA826aceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/n9jumF6ErMMfITm3Av3jv7u0f3g>
Subject: [Isis-wg] ISIS SR Flexible Algorithm
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 18:17:50 -0000

Hi Shraddha, Peter, et al,

The comment on the draft I had was that the conflict case where two ISIS routers advertise the same multi-homed prefix with a different algorithm needs to be covered. I wouldn’t try and optimize for this and would just do whatever is simplest but avoids loops (e.g., log the situation and prefer the path computed with the lowest numbered algorithm).

Thanks,
Acee