Archive

Ketan -

Thanx for the comments.
I think we do want to allow MSD support for values other than imposition values. We will revise the text so we are not restricted to only imposition cases.

  Les

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 1:51 AM
> To: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>rg>; isis-wg@ietf.org
> Cc: isis-ads@ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-07
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I support this document and would like to ask the authors and WG to
> consider if we can expand the scope of this draft to not just "imposition" of
> the SID stack but also other similar limits related to other actions (e.g.
> reading, processing, etc.). With Segment Routing, we are coming across
> various actions that nodes need to do with the SID stack for different
> purposes and IMHO it would be useful to extend the MSD ability to cover
> those as they arise.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ketan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Isis-wg [mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian
> Hopps
> Sent: 20 December 2017 14:03
> To: isis-wg@ietf.org
> Cc: isis-ads@ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd@ietf.org
> Subject: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-07
> 
> 
> The authors have asked for and we are starting a WG Last Call on
> 
>  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd/
> 
> which will last an extended 4 weeks to allow for year-end PTO patterns.
> 
> An IPR statement exists:
> 
>   https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-isis-
> segment-routing-msd
> 
> Authors please reply to the list indicating whether you are aware of any
> *new* IPR.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg

Re: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-07