Re: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-07

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Wed, 20 December 2017 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6D21243F3; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 12:10:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GXDSEoqRcazM; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 12:10:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D81412422F; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 12:01:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2061; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1513800104; x=1515009704; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=AXnRxBq61AqZXDgRTmebMf/yEOwXGM8W09Gy19ULx64=; b=WewLitkY1BiKfpKjigGQV0mzh08GaG3ibbUsLCEupKgT1pWD4EsfSUp/ kxHotSTs9obke39UWW65op5nOFvLOaJIArIvWkPsdhhBUUnMhwArxMb0G ldG+H6AZkKpRIm+BQ8NVWpHaPjAX4QZ65I3jFrLbanNtX1m3YEBQaZ8TS M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AkAQCswDpa/4cNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYM+ZnQnB44gjw6CApclghUKGA2FFgKFFD8YAQEBAQEBAQEBayiFIwEBAQEDAQEbHTQLDAQCAQgRBAEBHwkHJwsUCQgCBAENBQiKIxCmToppAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWDf4ISgVaBaYMsgy8BAReHTwWjRAKHfo0lgiCGFYtMjR6JMQIRGQGBOgEfOYFPbxU8gimCVByBZ3iJUoEVAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,433,1508803200"; d="scan'208";a="334601603"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Dec 2017 20:01:43 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-006.cisco.com (xch-aln-006.cisco.com [173.36.7.16]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vBKK1hq2029648 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 20 Dec 2017 20:01:43 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) by XCH-ALN-006.cisco.com (173.36.7.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 14:01:42 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 14:01:42 -0600
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com>, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "isis-wg@ietf.org" <isis-wg@ietf.org>
CC: "isis-ads@ietf.org" <isis-ads@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-07
Thread-Index: AQHTeW0yt4SjFYWr8keDb9AE3mXNFKNMYa+AgABFv5A=
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 20:01:42 +0000
Message-ID: <3f896bcf14014858bbeff810854b627d@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
References: <87ind1pzn8.fsf@chopps.org> <3406a4622ee74862bd7be4477cc0bd5a@XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <3406a4622ee74862bd7be4477cc0bd5a@XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.0.239]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/oUhFOJbEPJ4TppwIXgx2Mzd2j4s>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-07
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 20:10:01 -0000

Ketan -

Thanx for the comments.
I think we do want to allow MSD support for values other than imposition values. We will revise the text so we are not restricted to only imposition cases.

  Les


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 1:51 AM
> To: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>; isis-wg@ietf.org
> Cc: isis-ads@ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-07
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I support this document and would like to ask the authors and WG to
> consider if we can expand the scope of this draft to not just "imposition" of
> the SID stack but also other similar limits related to other actions (e.g.
> reading, processing, etc.). With Segment Routing, we are coming across
> various actions that nodes need to do with the SID stack for different
> purposes and IMHO it would be useful to extend the MSD ability to cover
> those as they arise.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ketan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Isis-wg [mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian
> Hopps
> Sent: 20 December 2017 14:03
> To: isis-wg@ietf.org
> Cc: isis-ads@ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd@ietf.org
> Subject: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-07
> 
> 
> The authors have asked for and we are starting a WG Last Call on
> 
>  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd/
> 
> which will last an extended 4 weeks to allow for year-end PTO patterns.
> 
> An IPR statement exists:
> 
>   https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-isis-
> segment-routing-msd
> 
> Authors please reply to the list indicating whether you are aware of any
> *new* IPR.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg