Re: [Isis-wg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-franke-isis-over-ipv6-00.txt

Christian Franke <> Mon, 06 July 2015 19:04 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAAF01B300E for <>; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 12:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bBvDbOTKas9K for <>; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 12:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DF6C1B2FEE for <>; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 12:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wiwl6 with SMTP id l6so293683555wiw.0 for <>; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 12:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aZxrt+WPqv/w5ECuVOF+5guEHtdP6mZ8ueSCKURADu0=; b=bHW4wS+kTZeCRB658G6G+Qh9CuIp3BNWm2C44MOr54feyqfETT67JN+zGKdjevdpgA VJq8aaegK58krnu2ZftJE/jAVNqeNSYSoKFvdLwqjNTorQr3G62LzKdSenpLXqa+BgfO oi6tlKqWC4RCopvmjrd0YRxUYeZU+gSDDF/LMm1Lb9hQjFUz72cuS8sRFLItHCwjJoAm KT/GDwgblCVtwSu9/tuxrRmfUDLQmQQh6pzgshlfh8V7SodF/c/Ulj2rjslMgbJ2Prlm Jk7OZIhuOcWE/zmrHkA4XH1qP0VJKp/ezsnKeZ3dAChyg5d/6ru+9GxWxzT7qJj6K5mB 9ARw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlmoC+TL2oslEua0k45BXd7xUuj8KTI3sUXBcqpq6T+bmcxuaIRfDd6WMK0EpwanXNGan93
X-Received: by with SMTP id et10mr10753495wib.20.1436209444899; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 12:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:238:f02a:9810:221:6aff:fe0c:cbe6? ([2a02:238:f02a:9810:221:6aff:fe0c:cbe6]) by with ESMTPSA id js3sm29577839wjc.5.2015. (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Jul 2015 12:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 21:04:02 +0200
From: Christian Franke <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Karsten Thomann <>,
References: <> <> <2393971.qq7UIhEPqS@linne>
In-Reply-To: <2393971.qq7UIhEPqS@linne>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-franke-isis-over-ipv6-00.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 19:04:08 -0000

Hello Karsten,

thank you for your input. I have made appropriate changes to the draft,
they can be seen here:

On 07/05/2015 10:37 PM, Karsten Thomann wrote:
> I'm not sure if we really need this encapsulation, as there are not many links layers left, but you 
> should at least mention that it avoids some problems with switches dropping ISIS LSPs if it's 
> encapsulated in IPv6

The homenet working group is currently in the process of selecting a
routing protocol to use. In that discussion some people voiced concern
that IS-IS would not be a good option since it was specified on top of
layer 2 instead of layer 3. This draft and the demo implementation were
done to address these concerns. On the one hand by showing that it
doesn't take much to run IS-IS on top of layer 3 and on the other hand
to provide a standardized way to do so, should the need arise.

I was not aware that switches existed which drop IS-IS PDUs, although
it's not that hard to imagine that there are switches which are broken
in that way. Could you name examples for switches showing this behavior?