IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Isis-wg] Last Call: draft-ietf-isis-layer2 (Extensions to IS-ISfor Layer-2 Systems) to Proposed Standard

Ayan Banerjee <ayabaner@cisco.com> Tue, 21 December 2010 18:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ayabaner@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB14E3A6A07; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:56:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FIhr3TEhVIGL; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:55:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5613A6998; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:55:59 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-4.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgQEAEqHEE2rRN+J/2dsb2JhbACVMY5Yc6Vam32FSQSEZYYdgx4
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,208,1291593600"; d="scan'208";a="236094251"
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.223.137]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Dec 2010 18:57:56 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBLIvuQh020610; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 18:57:56 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-22b.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.112]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:57:56 -0800
Received: from 10.21.93.27 ([10.21.93.27]) by xmb-sjc-22b.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.112]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 18:57:55 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.28.0.101117
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:57:54 -0800
From: Ayan Banerjee <ayabaner@cisco.com>
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>, IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C93638B2.8D7D4%ayabaner@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [Isis-wg] Last Call: draft-ietf-isis-layer2 (Extensions to IS-ISfor Layer-2 Systems) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AcuP6MJ1ppuemdexQq256PiY0uazIwKLzavQAcpAAKw=
In-Reply-To: <AE36820147909644AD2A7CA014B1FB520CCCD86F@xmb-sjc-222.amer.cisco.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Dec 2010 18:57:56.0300 (UTC) FILETIME=[FA8218C0:01CBA140]
Cc: isis-wg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] Last Call: draft-ietf-isis-layer2 (Extensions to IS-ISfor Layer-2 Systems) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 18:56:00 -0000

Les,

Thanks much for looking at this. We have posted another version of the draft
with the MAC-RI-TLV code point to be at 147. There are some minor edits in
the 09 version that was received as part of Last Call.

Thanks,
Ayan


On 12/12/10 8:21 AM, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> wrote:

> There is a conflict between the suggested value of 141 (Section 2.1.
> The MAC-Reachability TLV) and the already assigned value in the IS-IS
> TLV codepoints registry:
> 
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints/
> 
> 141       inter-AS reachability information       n    y    n
> [RFC5316]
> 
> While this conflict will no doubt get sorted out by IANA when they make
> the official assignment, it is likely to be of interest to early
> implementors of all the L2 IS-IS technologies who likely are using the
> conflicting value (141).
> 
>    Les
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of The IESG
>> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 9:11 AM
>> To: IETF-Announce
>> Cc: isis-wg@ietf.org
>> Subject: [Isis-wg] Last Call: draft-ietf-isis-layer2 (Extensions to
> IS-
>> ISfor Layer-2 Systems) to Proposed Standard
>> 
>> The IESG has received a request from the IS-IS for IP Internets WG
>> (isis)
>> to consider the following document:
>> 
>> - 'Extensions to IS-IS for Layer-2 Systems '
>>    <draft-ietf-isis-layer2-08.txt> as a Proposed Standard
>> 
>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>> final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to
> the
>> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2010-12-14. Exceptionally,
>> comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please
>> retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>> 
>> The file can be obtained via
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-isis-layer2-08.txt
>> 
>> 
>> IESG discussion can be tracked via
>> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag
>> =18360&rfc_flag=0
>> 
>> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Isis-wg mailing list
>> Isis-wg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email