Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption poll for draft-ginsberg-isis-te-app

"Naiming Shen (naiming)" <naiming@cisco.com> Wed, 28 June 2017 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <naiming@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9F8127076; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 11:58:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k19xNht6juvg; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 11:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ED911205D3; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 11:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2401; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1498676316; x=1499885916; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=bpR+do9ZEVSHdlpPzAmj39Ny9AmBiSMNxXM3qA4ktZs=; b=QoaqKEpnW7Fleyhze32N/lRSV9EyKn8LybYe0GMpuW4h+4b3fpIV7L4z JPb6f57lGRr4F1fBOG2VUGCPdWXrjVQ6obBfRxGhmyFxH8WreppuOnJkK sGCdT0BdVgM9bTrUFFKdZQTewZ5X0ZkuWjRqsxSS15Z/djPeVcunoJKVW E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CYAACV+1NZ/5RdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBg1hjgQ4HjX6RZ5V6ghEhC4VwAoMJPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUYAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQIBAQE4NAsFBwQCAQgOAwQBAQEeCQcnCxQJCAIEDgWKKAgQtBCLSgEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFgyeFLCyCeYQ7EQIBGyYMgxGCMQWXI4dRAoc3jDe?= =?us-ascii?q?CCoVKikKVJwEfOH8LdBVJEgGEfhyBZnYBiDOBDQEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,276,1496102400"; d="scan'208";a="447271765"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Jun 2017 18:58:34 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (xch-aln-005.cisco.com [173.36.7.15]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v5SIwYoW026947 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 28 Jun 2017 18:58:34 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:58:33 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-004.cisco.com ([173.37.102.14]) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com ([173.37.102.14]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:58:33 -0500
From: "Naiming Shen (naiming)" <naiming@cisco.com>
To: Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net>
CC: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "isis-wg@ietf.org" <isis-wg@ietf.org>, "isis-chairs@ietf.org" <isis-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ginsberg-isis-te-app.authors@ietf.org" <draft-ginsberg-isis-te-app.authors@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption poll for draft-ginsberg-isis-te-app
Thread-Index: AQHS8BtCozlDCsNq/EiY8bdnl0MQZ6I62U+AgAAbXgA=
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 18:58:33 +0000
Message-ID: <B2429D24-B9C5-495E-81C7-C90B5D15A762@cisco.com>
References: <8760fgfakp.fsf@chopps.org> <MWHPR05MB28293347D8F2AB8BAA0BE0EEA9DD0@MWHPR05MB2829.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR05MB28293347D8F2AB8BAA0BE0EEA9DD0@MWHPR05MB2829.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.33.58.49]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <B12707CCF32CD5448AA7803B6D2A0740@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/zjTqdszLQDYxEmpij2AyHMgFyBM>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption poll for draft-ginsberg-isis-te-app
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 18:58:38 -0000

Support.

- Naiming

> On Jun 28, 2017, at 10:20 AM, Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> ISIS WG,
> 
> I oppose adoption of this draft as a working group item.
> 
> After the discussion in Chicago, I proposed alternative encodings that use the 
> concept of an attribute set that I was hopeful would be incorporated in a merged 
> draft on this topic.
> 
> These are described in the following email.
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg/current/msg05081.html
> 
> I believe that these alternative encodings have two main advantages over those
> proposed in draft-ginsberg-isis-te-app.
> 
> First, they are much less disruptive to existing deployments using the existing 
> TE attributes, and they provide a less disruptive migration path.
> 
> Second, they are more flexible and useful, because they do not attempt to
> define specific applications.  
> 
> I am happy to publish the alternative encodings as a stand-alone draft.  I did 
> not do so initially in the interest of promoting compromise after the discussion in 
> Chicago.  However, the basic encodings in draft-ginsberg-isis-te-app have not changed 
> significantly.  They do not capture the advantages of the alternative encodings described above.
> 
> Given the current lack of compromise reflected in draft-ginsberg-isis-te-app, I think
> that the text is not a good basis for working group work on this topic.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Isis-wg [mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 4:31 PM
> To: isis-wg@ietf.org
> Cc: isis-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ginsberg-isis-te-app.authors@ietf.org
> Subject: [Isis-wg] WG Adoption poll for draft-ginsberg-isis-te-app
> 
> 
> Hi Folks,
> 
> The authors have requested the IS-IS WG adopt
> 
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ginsberg-isis-te-app/
> 
> as a working group document. Please indicate your support or no-support for taking on this work.
> 
> Authors: Please indicate your knowledge of any IPR related to this work to the list as well.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris & Hannes.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg