[Isis-wg] WG LC on MPLS doc
David Ward <dward@cisco.com> Fri, 02 May 2008 16:06 UTC
Return-Path: <isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: isis-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-isis-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B269228C41B;
Fri, 2 May 2008 09:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA36228C362
for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 May 2008 09:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.375
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.375 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.223,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id UbPqAhI2eMKv for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 2 May 2008 09:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C64528C439
for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2008 09:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,427,1204520400"; d="scan'208,217";a="7023885"
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158])
by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 May 2008 12:04:15 -0400
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13])
by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m42G4FnB002127;
Fri, 2 May 2008 12:04:15 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com
[64.102.31.102])
by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m42G4FxE018053;
Fri, 2 May 2008 16:04:15 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.52]) by
xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Fri, 2 May 2008 12:04:15 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([171.68.225.134]) by xmb-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Fri, 2 May 2008 12:04:14 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753)
To: isis mailing list <isis-wg@ietf.org>, Christian Hopps <chopps@rawdofmt.org>
Message-Id: <49C9D23D-EFC0-426C-9E04-FF42505D578E@cisco.com>
From: David Ward <dward@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 11:04:11 -0500
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 May 2008 16:04:14.0683 (UTC)
FILETIME=[2AF04AB0:01C8AC6E]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=3198; t=1209744255;
x=1210608255; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001;
h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
d=cisco.com; i=dward@cisco.com;
z=From:=20David=20Ward=20<dward@cisco.com>
|Subject:=20WG=20LC=20on=20MPLS=20doc |Sender:=20
|To:=20isis=20mailing=20list=20<isis-wg@ietf.org>,=0A=20=20
=20=20=20=20=20=20Christian=20Hopps=20<chopps@rawdofmt.org>;
bh=dL7rPcjR2YssvhIGhceRAelj3Lgo1uZywggNs2GDVdE=;
b=IqMHGy/svWTi/Fu2WQdY9VUkDrbbepxzilc2rHGlfjvf0yH+wuSd5X9aQo
hAPPLs/1A7a9JPG+gAWd1r5TLkn0wC2jyDw99okJUmImIpbRwFzID8nrlQba
pDnnukib2+;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=dward@cisco.com; dkim=pass (
sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim1001 verified; );
Cc: mrm@gblx.net, JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com>,
alberto.tempiabonda@telecomitalia.it,
Kenji Kumaki <ke-kumaki@kddi.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Subject: [Isis-wg] WG LC on MPLS doc
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0840084232=="
Sender: isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org
All - Many apologies for getting this draft to you late for review but, it is in IETF LC: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-09 They authors, MPLS WG chairs and Routing ADs would like you to give comments in a 2 week WG LC. Please send all comments on this draft by May 16, 2008. In particular I want to call to your attention on LSP origination trigger mechanisms (which are stated outside the scope of the draft). It appears to be unclear what happens during a link flap with an interesting number of tunnels traversing that link. Will it trigger LSP flooding to advert/update the TE-LSP-count subtlv? Will this scenario cause a storm? RFC 3784 states with respect to sub-TLV 11: " For stability reasons, rapid changes in the values in this sub-TLV SHOULD NOT cause rapid generation of LSPs." How should this be addressed? What should the ISIS WG state as a general policy for other WGs to put in their docs as we have run into this issue several times in the last few years? Many thanks. -DWard, Chopps
_______________________________________________ Isis-wg mailing list Isis-wg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
- [Isis-wg] WG LC on MPLS doc David Ward
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG LC on MPLS doc David Ward