IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Isms] RFC 6065 on Using Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting Services to Dynamically Provision View-Based Access Control Model User-to-Group Mappings

"Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com> Tue, 31 May 2011 23:16 UTC

Return-Path: <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
X-Original-To: isms@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isms@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A589B130014 for <isms@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:16:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y1MXyjsXE1sy for <isms@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:16:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.63]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A0713000E for <isms@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:16:28 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=UVmCxMfPnygortk2iI36iJjW9QJfyvucdLs+BJbiBrXSZ3ieZV93B+uQWyIZvpz6; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [76.254.53.66] (helo=oemcomputer) by elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>) id 1QRYAl-0002qr-TH for isms@ietf.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:16:28 -0400
Message-ID: <002501cc1fe9$450fb4c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
From: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
To: isms@ietf.org
References: <20101210013309.4AB75E0715@rfc-editor.org><4D023028.2070800@ieca.com><5CF1BEAB386540BEBF3026C2FE92FF15@23FX1C1><sdmxoccjsy.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net> <000401cb995c$b64afdc0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 16:20:01 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478
X-ELNK-Trace: 4488c18417c9426da92b9037bc8bcf44d4c20f6b8d69d888cc964a8bf633b3823e4e78064800378830a241e3398a6b99350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 76.254.53.66
Subject: Re: [Isms] RFC 6065 on Using Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting Services to Dynamically Provision View-Based Access Control Model User-to-Group Mappings
X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group <isms.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isms>
List-Post: <mailto:isms@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 23:16:31 -0000

Hi -

Does anyone have anything to report regarding RFC 6065 implementation,
deployment, or operational experience?  Has anyone looked into it and
decided that some other approach was needed?

Randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email