Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)) to Draft Standard

Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> Thu, 05 May 2011 13:57 UTC

Return-Path: <turners@ieca.com>
X-Original-To: isms@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isms@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33402E08A2 for <isms@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 May 2011 06:57:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.477
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.477 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.121, BAYES_00=-2.599, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OiTNhBmgRAFN for <isms@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 May 2011 06:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm26-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm26-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 527D7E08A1 for <isms@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 May 2011 06:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [98.139.91.62] by nm26.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 May 2011 13:57:08 -0000
Received: from [98.139.91.43] by tm2.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 May 2011 13:57:08 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1043.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 May 2011 13:57:08 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 85154.21491.bm@omp1043.mail.sp2.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 87401 invoked from network); 5 May 2011 13:57:07 -0000
Received: from thunderfish.local (turners@96.231.128.192 with plain) by smtp111.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 05 May 2011 06:57:06 -0700 PDT
X-Yahoo-SMTP: ZrP3VLSswBDL75pF8ymZHDSu9B.vcMfDPgLJ
X-YMail-OSG: m91pS7UVM1lYKWhamgRXHTw0kYueRlHH6Z3g5dckAvH3ddu BUnvYbgAmGuWXwJQbKDCjUSeRIL.f0R8WZj0dJsAafYzD1ALpBI7Oomyelm1 64dcBG07oIyppmDjfa18Aela3nTBHfyV.NEax9wu65gMtHq_Z4sSTD8sOq7q 3qZ3pIm9aHBDz5zB_M.03IWY6fAae89fQaNL0mKGnpMZyGIDddD8lt3Sl.Od 2fhwgZjmROYe9kTR3P44upoRdd8dUH38pIwRLuSRz3PjXxD4vaak1dOyYDt6 oU9i451HYXS6c_1E8tX3sYbfAnSVFn9Lbq5yV8YRj33YuWigLqvHSJucd8JC BRJ7afxjGGjXZupuOn02kcyUqYvgBU9.Iu.ttrx146uc-
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
Message-ID: <4DC2ACB1.2080501@ieca.com>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 09:57:05 -0400
From: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
References: <20110419211456.203DAE084A@ietfc.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110430150731.029f3fd8@resistor.net> <4DBEC59F.2030902@ieca.com> <sdliynq2yb.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net>
In-Reply-To: <sdliynq2yb.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: isms@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)) to Draft Standard
X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group <isms.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isms>
List-Post: <mailto:isms@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 13:57:12 -0000

Wes,

I asked Peter Tuesday about this and he confirmed that we don't need to 
say anything about setting the flag in the new text but you did need to 
say something about it with the old text.

spt

On 5/3/11 10:22 AM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 02 May 2011 16:54:23 +0200, Sean Turner<turners@ieca.com>  said:
>
> ST>  FYI I also asked about setting the UseSTD3ASCIIRules flag and Pete
> ST>  said it was completely unnecessary as far as he could tell.  That's
> ST>  why I just dropped it.
>
> I'm glad I took good notes last time.  The flag setting came from
> comments from Peter Saint-Andre:
>
> ******* CLOSED The definition of SnmpTLSAddress states that
>          "internationalized hostnames are encoded in US-ASCII as
>          specified in RFC 3490", but I think this could be defined more
>          precisely because (1) RFC 3490 does not talk about
>          "internationalized hostnames", (2) you need to state that you
>          are using the ToASCII operation, and (3) you need to specify
>          whether the UseSTD3ASCIIRules flag is set. This definition
>          also appears to make normative references to RFC 1033 and RFC
>          3490, but those specifications are not included in the
>          Normative References section. Finally, this definition
>          references RFC 3986 but that specification is never used here.
>
> 	+ WH: I've changed the text to the following to address your
> 	  concerns; please let me know if you believe it needs further
> 	  changes.
>
>              A hostname is always in US-ASCII (as per RFC1033);
>              internationalized hostnames are encoded in US-ASCII as
>              domain names after transformation via the ToASCII
>              operation specified in RFC 3490.  The ToASCII operation
>              MUST be performed with the UseSTD3ASCIIRules flag set.
>              The hostname is followed by a colon ':' (US-ASCII
>              character 0x3A) and a decimal port number in US-ASCII.
>              The name SHOULD be fully qualified whenever possible.
>
>
> 	+ WH: references for 3490 and 1033 moved to the normative section.
>
> 	+ WH: The 3986 reference has been removed (in the process of
> 	  responding to other similar comments).
>
>          + Peter: Excellent.
>