Re: [Isms] RETRACTION: Last Call: Progressing RFCs 5343, 5590, 5991, and 6353 to Internet Standard
Sean Turner <TurnerS@ieca.com> Fri, 03 January 2014 18:52 UTC
Return-Path: <TurnerS@ieca.com>
X-Original-To: isms@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isms@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652741ADFC3 for <isms@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 10:52:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.567
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cwlu_D2qZfng for <isms@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 10:52:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gateway02.websitewelcome.com (gateway02.websitewelcome.com [69.56.159.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E401ADFC6 for <isms@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 10:52:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gateway02.websitewelcome.com (Postfix, from userid 5007) id 36B0446661D0; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:52:13 -0600 (CST)
Received: from gator3286.hostgator.com (gator3286.hostgator.com [198.57.247.250]) by gateway02.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15BB44666154 for <isms@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:52:13 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [173.73.130.192] (port=61200 helo=[192.168.1.4]) by gator3286.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <TurnerS@ieca.com>) id 1Vz9qu-0007gW-4M; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 12:52:12 -0600
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_723E184C-482D-4C50-BE18-53D9EFB01A3B"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: Sean Turner <TurnerS@ieca.com>
In-Reply-To: <8761q1aqa2.fsf@deeperthought.bsdly.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 13:52:08 -0500
Message-Id: <78545669-D27D-487C-B3AE-4011C6955555@ieca.com>
References: <20140103180641.30180.68094.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <8761q1aqa2.fsf@deeperthought.bsdly.net>
To: "Peter N. M. Hansteen" <peter@bsdly.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator3286.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ieca.com
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 173.73.130.192
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: ([192.168.1.4]) [173.73.130.192]:61200
X-Source-Auth: sean.turner@ieca.com
X-Email-Count: 17
X-Source-Cap: ZG9tbWdyNDg7ZG9tbWdyNDg7Z2F0b3IzMjg2Lmhvc3RnYXRvci5jb20=
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, isms@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Isms] RETRACTION: Last Call: Progressing RFCs 5343, 5590, 5991, and 6353 to Internet Standard
X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group <isms.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isms/>
List-Post: <mailto:isms@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 18:52:22 -0000
I requested this retraction because I made a fat finger mistake and included 5991 instead of 5591 in the last call (David Harrington’s keen eye caught this). I tired to correct the mistake and get a revised LC issued, but I could change everything in the request/write-up except the name of the document that gets points to from the LC: status-change-5343-5590-5991-6353-to-internet-standard-01. I thought that might add confusion so after consultation with the secretariat I asked for them to retract it, I put notes in the datatracker (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-5343-5590-5991-6353-to-internet-standard/history/) for all to see, and am working on a new and corrected LC. Apologies for any confusion. spt On Jan 03, 2014, at 13:12, Peter N. M. Hansteen <peter@bsdly.net> wrote: > This begs the question: > > Do the withdrawal requests contain any publishable specifics as to why > these status changes should not go forward? > > Yours, > Peter N. M. Hansteen > > IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat@ietf.org> writes: > >> The following Last Call has been withdrawn by request of the area director: >> >> The IESG has received a request from multiple participants to make >> the following status changes: >> >> - RFC5343 from Draft Standard to Internet Standard >> (Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Context EngineID >> Discovery) >> >> - RFC5991 from Proposed Standard to Internet Standard >> (Teredo Security Updates) >> >> - RFC5590 from Draft Standard to Internet Standard >> (Transport Subsystem for the Simple Network Management Protocol >> (SNMP)) >> >> - RFC6353 from Draft Standard to Internet Standard >> (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple >> Network Management Protocol (SNMP)) >> > > -- > Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team > http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/ > "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic" > delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.