Re: [Isms] Second Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)) to Draft Standard
SM <sm@resistor.net> Wed, 11 May 2011 06:32 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: isms@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isms@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB42FE0665; Tue, 10 May 2011 23:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lpvu5Ph71U7d; Tue, 10 May 2011 23:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EEA3E068B; Tue, 10 May 2011 23:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from subman.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.4/8.14.5.Beta0) with ESMTP id p4B6W7G8025832; Tue, 10 May 2011 23:32:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1305095532; bh=/e9Z2uGvl+Q9QtVZyn9mEyilE26k0/X9S63Pp/MTtXI=; h=Message-Id:X-Mailer:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To: References:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=Go07+0vnRiIcK31pbEuZOL7EhllLItmvwKYK77/kaZQuScaR6/BEc9IraRnHt5pN1 NKXJ/2p15/OGtrwAPx5kGeaugp1hN49sJtvkv8xzXFjYHPGDe0P3reUKpE+uoQp7Bn 0RW8eaIlJzpjzKyOswSv91tj+8yG81UblcFMoBVA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1305095532; bh=/e9Z2uGvl+Q9QtVZyn9mEyilE26k0/X9S63Pp/MTtXI=; h=Message-Id:X-Mailer:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To: References:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=uymHkh+V6Pp7OQrV56RMBT/iKD1tsGIjPzqgxTGyveu8tASRbq2EVuuXEp9q9IKyA osIZvxUlpyM1GeHihaUpalxfV84PXOlAoSQsthRTzX7G7pzsFiBkixHSNrf4fmFADg 7xHfKr2QWNtXLHtkwUJYXlMfMZTgiJ1SIrMq8BYk=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20110510231928.02c3d078@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 23:28:59 -0700
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <20110509204331.885F6E0947@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20110509204331.885F6E0947@ietfa.amsl.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 12 May 2011 09:37:20 -0700
Cc: isms@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Isms] Second Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)) to Draft Standard
X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group <isms.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isms>
List-Post: <mailto:isms@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 06:32:24 -0000
At 13:43 09-05-2011, The IESG wrote: >The IESG has received a request from the isms WG (isms) to consider the >following document: > >- 'Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple Network > Management Protocol (SNMP) ' > RFC 5953 as a Draft Standard > >Two issues were raised during the first Last Call: 1) references to >IDNA 2003 (RFC 3490) need to be replaced by references to IDNA 2008 >(RFC 5890), and 2) references to RFC 1033 need to be replaced by >references to 1123. This Last Call is focused on these two issues. [snip] >Changing the references also means the downref call needs to be >updated, as follows: > > This specification contains eight normative references to standards > track documents of lower maturity: RFCs 1123, 3584, 4347, 4366, > 5246, 5280, 5890, and 5952. RFC 1123 is an Internet Standard (STD 3). The normative reference is not a downref. Regards, -sm P.S. I am not asking for a third Last Call.