Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)) to Draft Standard
Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Thu, 05 May 2011 14:26 UTC
Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: isms@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isms@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2725AE08B7 for <isms@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 May 2011 07:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vcut5Plg3Fi3 for <isms@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 May 2011 07:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.236.43]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260EBE06A6 for <isms@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 May 2011 07:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (wjh.hardakers.net [10.0.0.2]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6EEA7131; Thu, 5 May 2011 07:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
References: <20110419211456.203DAE084A@ietfc.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110430150731.029f3fd8@resistor.net> <4DBEC59F.2030902@ieca.com> <sdliynq2yb.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net> <4DC2ACB1.2080501@ieca.com>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 07:25:26 -0700
In-Reply-To: <4DC2ACB1.2080501@ieca.com> (Sean Turner's message of "Thu, 05 May 2011 09:57:05 -0400")
Message-ID: <sdbozh8bs9.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: isms@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)) to Draft Standard
X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group <isms.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isms>
List-Post: <mailto:isms@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 14:26:00 -0000
>>>>> On Thu, 05 May 2011 09:57:05 -0400, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> said: ST> I asked Peter Tuesday about this and he confirmed that we don't need ST> to say anything about setting the flag in the new text but you did ST> need to say something about it with the old text. Ok, thanks for checking on it and good to know! -- Wes Hardaker Cobham Analytic Solutions
- [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Securi… The IESG
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… Sean Turner
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… SM
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… Sean Turner
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… Sean Turner
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… Sean Turner
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Se… Wes Hardaker