Re: [Isms] Second Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)) to Draft Standard

Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> Wed, 11 May 2011 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <turners@ieca.com>
X-Original-To: isms@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isms@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C1EE0773 for <isms@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 07:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.299, BAYES_00=-2.599, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ENgGY7dtQ-Jh for <isms@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 07:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm11.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm11.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B99E0E076F for <isms@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 07:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [98.139.91.63] by nm11.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 May 2011 14:16:14 -0000
Received: from [98.139.91.5] by tm3.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 May 2011 14:16:14 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1005.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 May 2011 14:16:14 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 695860.64701.bm@omp1005.mail.sp2.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 4389 invoked from network); 11 May 2011 14:16:14 -0000
Received: from thunderfish.local (turners@96.231.116.78 with plain) by smtp111.biz.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 May 2011 07:16:14 -0700 PDT
X-Yahoo-SMTP: ZrP3VLSswBDL75pF8ymZHDSu9B.vcMfDPgLJ
X-YMail-OSG: 5sMRcBIVM1m4Vs6tvK2Rf7j3BZhXzozE_QLLLqMI.PWffvs IyKdFCUKnOZ0r5BYEqh0nvv1Gc8EA6ngiygKJ25D8ANp9sGxAPmCoMF4OjS0 6aDV5xCIpEEmnDjSqDhaBeG9toEu89s8VwSDmqL5fQBMFZFCRezMRrgu.daj 5E0A52ONZHdb6crKvSRiDyidsBknroX2rCL2XnH4ikaMBC3tYwuP5NDyT7t6 VzeSGOpdA.Bm67sYbrNicjB3nyRNTyVJ30aNCxKhiU4P3ezijDkWYmPLMEcj 0G9LKGTQpS2dTSskHQJXCt5UiRFx5fBJ6GU9nzQtSOjGnDlWZS.8z2Gl8KfA .5.DkhvpnV_85C2jfxIS_6Kh78hRvR3ftdB3PXbcFCY8-
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
Message-ID: <4DCA9A2C.5080900@ieca.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 10:16:12 -0400
From: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
References: <20110509204331.885F6E0947@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110510231928.02c3d078@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20110510231928.02c3d078@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, isms@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Isms] Second Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)) to Draft Standard
X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group <isms.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isms>
List-Post: <mailto:isms@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:16:15 -0000

On 5/11/11 2:28 AM, SM wrote:
> At 13:43 09-05-2011, The IESG wrote:
>> The IESG has received a request from the isms WG (isms) to consider the
>> following document:
>>
>> - 'Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple Network
>> Management Protocol (SNMP) '
>> RFC 5953 as a Draft Standard
>>
>> Two issues were raised during the first Last Call: 1) references to
>> IDNA 2003 (RFC 3490) need to be replaced by references to IDNA 2008
>> (RFC 5890), and 2) references to RFC 1033 need to be replaced by
>> references to 1123. This Last Call is focused on these two issues.
>
> [snip]
>
>> Changing the references also means the downref call needs to be
>> updated, as follows:
>>
>> This specification contains eight normative references to standards
>> track documents of lower maturity: RFCs 1123, 3584, 4347, 4366,
>> 5246, 5280, 5890, and 5952.
>
> RFC 1123 is an Internet Standard (STD 3). The normative reference is not
> a downref.
>
> Regards,
> -sm
>
> P.S. I am not asking for a third Last Call.

Well at least now I don't have to add it to the downref registry.

spt