Re: [ipwave] ITU-R liaison statement 1686

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Sat, 17 October 2020 08:31 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F443A0858 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 01:31:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.46
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.213, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_DOTEDU=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YQpxdJExB9VL for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 01:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEB643A084B for <its@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 01:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 09H8VIL4019639 for <its@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 10:31:18 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id A7994200DB7 for <its@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 10:31:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D6C02007F8 for <its@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 10:31:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.11.240.5] ([10.11.240.5]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 09H8VIFJ005712 for <its@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 10:31:18 +0200
To: its@ietf.org
References: <4725B596-F5FA-49F9-A312-BC40CD053F23@kuehlewind.net> <9af15ae85892d25b98fc6dda98a8851c@vigilsec.com> <CAPK2DexczsruB-PwP0VXk6eS89F1ZQitOEJEASB1hAraQJR8cw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <eb8f818c-a246-099f-8de3-567bcbbc023e@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 10:31:17 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPK2DexczsruB-PwP0VXk6eS89F1ZQitOEJEASB1hAraQJR8cw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/1R4Mh1cgn5c6bOzrCFe9sUkBe4s>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] ITU-R liaison statement 1686
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 08:31:24 -0000

I think too it is a good idea to point to our I-D.

But, since the ITU-R liaison is about CAV (Connected and Automated 
Vehicles), I think there would be advantageous to point to particular 
places in the draft that make for Connected and for Automated.

For the Connected part it is straightforward, because many communication 
protocols are referred to in the I-D.

For the Automated part, maybe the V2V use-cases described in the I-D.

Maybe other parts of the I-D as well.

Alex


Le 17/10/2020 à 09:47, Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong a écrit :
> Hi Russ,
> We can point out our IPWAVE Problem Statement and Use Cases Draft can be 
> a good foundation for their work:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-19 
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-19>
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Paul
> 
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 4:05 AM <housley@vigilsec.com 
> <mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>> wrote:
> 
>     The ITU-R sent a liaison: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1686/
>     <https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1686/>
> 
>     Does anyone think that the IPWAVE WG should reply?
> 
>     Russ
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     its mailing list
>     its@ietf.org <mailto:its@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>     <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ===========================
> Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D.
> Associate Professor
> Department of Computer Science and Engineering
> Sungkyunkwan University
> Office: +82-31-299-4957
> Email: jaehoon.paul@gmail.com <mailto:jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>, 
> pauljeong@skku.edu <mailto:pauljeong@skku.edu>
> Personal Homepage: http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php 
> <http://cpslab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> its mailing list
> its@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>