From nobody Mon Feb 21 12:26:56 2022
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56073A0DD4
 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 12:26:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id yFH-h2N8H6Gw for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Mon, 21 Feb 2022 12:26:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74A8C3A0DD1
 for <its@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 12:26:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347DAE4A39;
 Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:26:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (pfs.iad.rg.net [198.180.150.6])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1EFACE4B94;
 Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:26:48 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <083f1894c6144529ba7021b75d234719@boeing.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:26:47 -0500
Cc: "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C6ACB817-A07D-4357-96A9-CF79134D8F05@vigilsec.com>
References: <30f9e373e5574b9387137379b31ecd0e@boeing.com>
 <083f1894c6144529ba7021b75d234719@boeing.com>
To: "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>,
 "Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/27jRZU0BG01ztQw0C5QYr1nSBkE>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] I-D Action:
 draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-26.txt
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF
 <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>,
 <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>,
 <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 20:26:55 -0000

Paul and Fred:

I think the update is more aligned with the documents that are advancing =
one the IETF stream.  That said, I would not be apposed to the inclusion =
of the 6M's, but not in a way that claims that there is only one =
approach way to address these things.  What do you think about that was =
a way forward?

Russ


> On Feb 21, 2022, at 2:56 PM, Templin (US), Fred L =
<Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote:
>=20
> Hi, I started reviewing this and found that it has been completely =
overhauled since I put my
> comments in many months ago. It has in fact been completely rewritten =
to favor the shared
> IPv6 multilink subnet model over multihop networks, to favor =
RPL/6LowPan over standard
> MANET routing protocols, to favor IPv6 ND changes over standard IPv6 =
ND, and to favor
> multilink DAD. None of that is necessary with AERO/OMNI and the =
NBMA-based virtual link
> created by the OMNI Adaptation. So, I stopped midway through marking =
up the document
> with my comments because it has taken a complete left turn and started =
down a wrong path.
>=20
> What is mainly at the heart of the divergence is that the document now =
embraces the
> multilink IPv6 subnet model vs the AERO/OMNI NBMA link model that was =
there the last
> time I looked. But, there is no need for such complication when there =
is a much simpler
> alternative at hand. I notice also that in the appendices the =
AERO/OMNI "6M's of Mobile
> Internetworking" was removed - at the very least that needs to be =
restored.
>=20
> In its current form, this document has been diverted to go down the =
wrong path. It
> needs to be either re-balanced or re-written.
>=20
> Thanks - Fred
>=20
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: its [mailto:its-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Templin (US), =
Fred L
>> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 7:28 AM
>> To: its@ietf.org; i-d-announce@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [ipwave] I-D Action: =
draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-26.txt
>>=20
>> Hi, it looks like a lot of what was in the draft regarding AERO/OMNI =
has been cut out
>> so that means I am going to have to re-review it. I will get to this =
a soon as possible;
>> hopefully in the next couple of days.
>>=20
>> Fred
>>=20
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: its [mailto:its-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of =
internet-drafts@ietf.org
>>> Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 9:00 PM
>>> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
>>> Cc: its@ietf.org
>>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [ipwave] I-D Action: =
draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-26.txt
>>>=20
>>> EXT email: be mindful of links/attachments.
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts =
directories.
>>> This draft is a work item of the IP Wireless Access in Vehicular =
Environments WG of the IETF.
>>>=20
>>>        Title           : IPv6 Wireless Access in Vehicular =
Environments (IPWAVE): Problem Statement and Use Cases
>>>        Author          : Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong
>>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-26.txt
>>> 	Pages           : 49
>>> 	Date            : 2022-02-20
>>>=20
>>> Abstract:
>>>   This document discusses the problem statement and use cases of
>>>   IPv6-based vehicular networking for Intelligent Transportation
>>>   Systems (ITS).  The main scenarios of vehicular communications are
>>>   vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V), vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I), and
>>>   vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communications.  First, this document
>>>   explains use cases using V2V, V2I, and V2X networking.  Next, for
>>>   IPv6-based vehicular networks, it makes a gap analysis of current
>>>   IPv6 protocols (e.g., IPv6 Neighbor Discovery, Mobility =
Management,
>>>   and Security & Privacy), and then enumerates requirements for the
>>>   extensions of those IPv6 protocols for IPv6-based vehicular
>>>   networking.
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>> =
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking/
>>>=20
>>> There is also an htmlized version available at:
>>> =
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networki=
ng-26
>>>=20
>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>> =
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking=
-26
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at =
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> its mailing list
>>> its@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>>=20
>> _______________________________________________
>> its mailing list
>> its@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> its mailing list
> its@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its

