Re: [ipwave] Should the IPWAVE WG adopt draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-networking-survey?

"Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com> Tue, 20 June 2017 21:56 UTC

Return-Path: <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC5DF131622 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 14:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.689
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.689 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HK_NAME_FM_MR_MRS=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IXEw8JdPNeZi for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 14:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22e.google.com (mail-io0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B7D112EB25 for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 14:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id t87so93282519ioe.0 for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 14:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8dYDsriLuPtYQwacIDupPWKXf2iXtM+GmKMfEa5DFjo=; b=bYsizt3LUfV+iFl/ZSOzLA2LY7HuM8GBwd59EAzhr9uzgRp77JkAD7IYJzbB5pdpnw hVjxDU6977RgpGCFiLIcmJqiDTMkPeE0Nkem4qJPh5Ww0U33Fsg2KIKP/4r2nZfe3p5n uV2jLMv1AFWk3kR3Pekvriq1IRDhrOFuwfFDrHnT2FB6z7vaWp+cgGuhUCkoz5Zw3VJL 5Tz/0z3f8zlPiiPIzDuJQcOneyY4atmo0Ol/Jn13DzZwArCRivG97iWMefb7R/D6J6/o 0IZ1wAw51ztR1LbUy6x+yrPkDN1o6GGuf+vUScPgdpQFQYp0gWyUZD9GbVCT+1Hja2pk kc/Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8dYDsriLuPtYQwacIDupPWKXf2iXtM+GmKMfEa5DFjo=; b=GikuA1oNXScPV4CqlDbn5hDMusmafvpagAMK/E4402bxzFvhx+E1NIOW0xgre3bvu8 ylxiVUmCBntlChpW0TaoTisxVU6ODp3U0XzlMU7R2kc+0yPoUY/wMCO9h05iSKx2ILP/ +3sN8BmUrQFL7pP+Hdl7OS41t/647bdbNHCS9Mk1v7MJpn4bAlmOchgYSPp0zQXakaor 4REr///mMvVykN8E7QSr+nHWqsOXwgdtxBNbpaSO//gqS/3CidNuPv4ICm0Nqd4NNvZj PWdPx+1RjuekzZnzaYzIMn/FlkMDR3DCGxeq6oo7PCwPN1fOTEEUCzeW9oBJ/gS1wTkU 3h9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOzMi3s53FLSOYa3MHbYrQdSfTtn/hA+ooo4YWPYlNNwUcF9JGIJ W8/xtgGXVNA6KYOCxvRUT6ej2KH8RA==
X-Received: by 10.107.178.211 with SMTP id b202mr32793495iof.101.1497995805411; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 14:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.123.93 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 14:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1497977954.2400.149.camel@gmail.com>
References: <CA50A382-F591-4A33-BAF9-1903E107BE02@vigilsec.com> <1497977954.2400.149.camel@gmail.com>
From: "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 06:56:14 +0900
Message-ID: <CAPK2DewLqSLVvOy5TFz3JaZKKJnKBCbuzm8xUh+sdWdivSm3Tg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rex Buddenberg <buddenbergr@gmail.com>
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, its <its@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114c84dadb74e405526b53a4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/2FFvRqgKYTZPnKOLrMuUE__t728>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Should the IPWAVE WG adopt draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-networking-survey?
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 21:56:49 -0000

Hi Rex,
As you mentioned, the revision of this draft will include the papers for
use cases that are based on
vehicular networking as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hwang T and Jeong J., "SANA: Safety-Aware Navigation
Application for pedestrian protection in vehicular networks",
In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference
on internet of vehicles (IOV), Chengdu, China, 19–21
December 2015, pp.127–138. Switzerland: Springer

Kim J, Jo Y and Jeong J., "Design and evaluation of a
smartphone-based alarming system for pedestrian safety
in vehicular networks", In: Proceedings of the 2nd international
conference on internet of vehicles (IOV), Chengdu,
China, 19–21 December 2015, pp.221–233. Switzerland:
Springer.

Shen Y, Jeong J, Oh T, et al., "CASD: a framework of
context-awareness safety driving in vehicular networks",
In: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on
advanced information networking and applications
workshops—device centric cloud (DC2), Crans-Montana,
Switzerland, 23–25 March 2016, pp.252–257.

Koukoumidis E, Peh L-S and Martonosi M. "SignalGuru:
leveraging mobile phones for collaborative traffic signal
schedule advisory", In: Proceedings of the 9th international
conference on mobile systems, applications, and services
(MobiSys), Washington, DC, 28 June–1 July 2011,
pp.127–140. New York: ACM.

Jeong J, Jeong H, Lee E, et al., "SAINT: self-adaptive
interactive navigation tool for cloud-based vehicular traffic
optimization", IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2016; 65(6):
4053–4067.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for your comments.

Best Regards,
Paul

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1:59 AM, Rex Buddenberg <buddenbergr@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Russ, et al,
>
> As a _survey_, this ID is fine.  There is value in simply cataloging
> the somewhat scattered efforts in one place.  So I'm thinking we should
> adopt as 'state of the art in the field'.  So I guess I'm ^ vis
> adoption.
>      But there are no use cases in the ID itself, only some of the
> references.  Therefore the ID does not meet the charter call.  ... at
> least not yet.
>      Further, there doesn't seem to be much of a sorting model or
> taxonomy.  What the ID does not cover (and was not Jeong's intent) is
> what is needed but not present.  The use cases should lead to a
> taxonomy and eventually an architecture -- should those signposts be
> present?  Or is this a proper subject for agenda bashing external to
> this draft?
>
> b
>
>
> On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 09:59 -0400, Russ Housley wrote:
> > The IPWAVE WG charter calls for the group to publish an Informational
> > document:
> >
> >    This group will work on an informational document
> >    that will explain the state of the art in the field and describe
> >    the use cases that will use IPv6 in order to focus the work of
> >    the group.
> >
> > Should the IPWAVE WG adopt draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-networking-
> > survey
> > as the starting point for this deliverable?
> >
> > See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-net
> > working-survey/
> >
> > Russ
> > _______________________________________________
> > its mailing list
> > its@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>
> _______________________________________________
> its mailing list
> its@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>



-- 
===========================
Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Software
Sungkyunkwan University
Office: +82-31-299-4957
Email: jaehoon.paul@gmail.com, pauljeong@skku.edu
Personal Homepage: http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php
<http://cpslab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php>