IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ipwave] FCC Moves Plan Forward to Chop Up Vehicle Safety Airwaves

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 17 December 2019 09:59 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B7012011D for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 01:59:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.631
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ObRf88MbWYbo for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 01:59:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DCD7120114 for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 01:59:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id xBH9xB9Y020419 for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:59:11 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 4265D203A9E for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:59:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BB52039CE for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:59:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.11.240.21] ([10.11.240.21]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id xBH9xBtp012919 for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:59:11 +0100
To: its@ietf.org
References: <EED81985-1D4C-41B2-8CCA-A46B96390A18@vigilsec.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <c680bd31-5f87-6fc9-60c8-2a0af9787483@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:59:10 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <EED81985-1D4C-41B2-8CCA-A46B96390A18@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/3j6AfWoEXYij5mZcib7Hwrl6kMo>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] FCC Moves Plan Forward to Chop Up Vehicle Safety Airwaves
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 09:59:16 -0000


Le 17/12/2019 à 01:01, Russ Housley a écrit :
> https://www.consumerreports.org/car-safety/fcc-moves-plan-forward-to-chop-up-vehicle-safety-airwaves/
[...]
> The FCC plan would divide 75 MHz of the safety spectrum between WiFi
> and auto safety applications. The FCC proposal allocates 20 MHz for a
> newer V2X technology, known as C-V2X, and leaves 10 MHz for either
> C-V2X or DSRC.

It is indeed a plan that invites to think about the future.

An implementation of IPv6 over OCB that uses a 20MHz channel, instead of 
10MHz, would no longer be 'illegal'.

I would like to ask whether FCC considers this potential C-V2X 20MHz 
channel to still be free of use for everyone (like the current 5.9GHz 
band) or will it be licensed and paid for? (like e.g. the 2.6 GHz band 
of LTE).

Alex



> _______________________________________________
> its mailing list
> its@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email