IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ipwave] RSU minor textual issue

François Simon <fygsimon@gmail.com> Thu, 18 May 2017 20:51 UTC

Return-Path: <fygsimon@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97ED3129BB6 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 May 2017 13:51:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2_l8VrDNMG52 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 May 2017 13:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22c.google.com (mail-qt0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4B14127BA3 for <its@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 May 2017 13:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id f55so44209619qta.3 for <its@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 May 2017 13:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=Lihs7gqWFlzMeKw8fZC4Z+sLm7bA+FOhq2CjOuWxidA=; b=WHdjtzwDirB7nDJxGjk20FmNN6ZF1Xod9FDr9pEsFUpHECtvhBVaLUlYKJvAaWe8zg awh9HGITuHx2eibrBCD9o9NGxOtyrDWUnctvRKOZEs5jmZPUjww3f3DBTGhrI/nXOZ1U bsgpHD/j9u9F48scWonILGriHsZvCIARLnJfFIMNnwjk6GlwigsTnqvS20d5jEXiGWpL KThgxIQWv9MTLLU3nmLjGiLDNv4cQ2url7uaRmf+7e9Ahkdw3HA0KOnaP7jmy48jS2lV ziXAUlNR9WfaLxuUNZVMQCmzxjc7lHIpJtphPbA+qbIhWUeTtSwNrK0bqtFHYjmF1iTb qm2g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=Lihs7gqWFlzMeKw8fZC4Z+sLm7bA+FOhq2CjOuWxidA=; b=Tb4+HLvE6YVTiq+7KwHysHaPK5k7eTGRZ/lwD3NAPewFaI0qrwooeOrjgD8NUYdGlC Zoj4av28yifyqTJfFTNH/ZYMNHABa0mNPXM0yXC8NxtHej59rV0Xp+3qfXKKODaq0cUI kbKqCABOv2/aIUgjzVdr06torKAXj4SduRe52UMFviDVXpcgjAQ89tPyBNW2Vhe03jKi nmkRuAfXbQu8iMoxnA6no6zfNkz8MllBWh4WUOtDLgiPA62fk+8kymeWO/tkN2zCR30R wPtPzHoz4V5d8zMPFOZvkbYtMK/g9nmwuzUge93nVKzi6QfUwufO8osJUGiYLRADHukq CDXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCzn6Cxv6tOPQhQwVQI5Ru9/ME0wDRQG3BZPzfj9Pc3oVw1WJVs aQ5U9Pdd9yYVdA==
X-Received: by 10.200.33.232 with SMTP id 37mr6407329qtz.189.1495140337104; Thu, 18 May 2017 13:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from FrancoisPC (pool-108-48-182-247.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [108.48.182.247]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f81sm4427105qkb.37.2017.05.18.13.45.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 May 2017 13:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: François Simon <fygsimon@gmail.com>
To: 'Russ Housley' <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: its@ietf.org, fygsimon@gmail.com
References: <b7d0f246-da90-ac56-db69-40e9e929900d@gmail.com> <3916AFEC-80E9-469F-A2D7-F66010AAB23C@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <3916AFEC-80E9-469F-A2D7-F66010AAB23C@vigilsec.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 16:45:34 -0400
Message-ID: <022e01d2d017$b2dd04a0$18970de0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_022F_01D2CFF6.2BCDD5A0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQLaRBK88xykj8VYhlOq8uhoK7bq9wLPbpucAksG+Is=
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/3o22oHAHDRS609cmxyQrBH18nVs>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] RSU minor textual issue
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 20:51:49 -0000

In the US, RSUs ARE NOT ROUTERS. There are logical boundaries between RSU
and devices accessing the infrastructure (when required):

 

 

 

From: its [mailto:its-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Russ Housley
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 9:34 AM
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Cc: its@ietf.org
Subject: [ipwave] RSU minor textual issue

 

 

On May 18, 2017, at 5:39 AM, Alexandre Petrescu
<alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com <mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> > wrote:

 

OLD:



RSU: Road Side Unit. An IP router equipped with, or connected to, at
least one interface that is 802.11 and that is an interface that
operates in OCB mode.


A comment was made stating that an RSU is not a router, and that an RSU
may be connected to a router via an interface, e.g. Ethernet, to access
the infrastructure if required.

But I think that some Road Side Units are indeed IP routers and they
access the infrastructure and the Internet.  This is an important point
when using the IP protocol - be connected.

I think I keep that text that way at this time.

End issue.

 

Alex:

 

Some RSUs will be routers, but others will not.  For example, an RSU that
sends messages to vehicles about foggy conditions does not need to be a
router.  I think the definition should allow both cases.

 

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email